Does having more than one nomination add more points so to speak? Does having a competitive nomination (no idea what that means) add more points? I understand what a primary nomination is and I guess that would add the most points via a nomination.
No. None will "add more points". However, more than one might enhance one's chances of an appointment. For each opening which a MOC has, he may nominate 10 individuals. He may submit the list three ways; Principal with ranked alternates, Principal with competitive alternates, or competitive. With the Principal (primary) method, the MOC selects his preferred candidate. If that candidate is 3Qed, he will receive an appointment. With the Competitive method, the MOC simply submitgs an alphabetical list, and the Academy, utilizing the aforementioned WPM/RAB totals, selects the most qualified candidate who is 3Qed. If the listed Principal candidate is not 3Qed, either the Academy picks his replacement (competitive alternates) or the MOC selects the alternate (ranked alternates). Once all the mandatory appointments have been designated (MOC, SecNav, Presidential, VP, etc), there are still openings in the class. Federal law states that most of these openings go to those qualified alternates (the other nine) from the MOCs slates. These appointments will go to those alternates nationwide ranked by order of merit (those with the highest WPM/RAB totals). So, for individual MOC competitive appointments, the successful candidate only has to have more WPM/RAB points than the other 3Qed individuals from his district with whom he is competiting directly. However, for the remainder, to be successful in the national pool, they have to have more points nationwide than their competitors. So, to ask the question you kinda but really didn't ask. How does more nominations increase ones chance of selection? Very common is the candidate who receives a nomination from his senator and then, for one reason or another, does not pursue a nomination from his local congressman. Since the state-wide slate is, by definition, very competitive, unless a candidate knows that he is the principal, primary, most competitive candidate on the slate, he should never forego the local slate where he will be much more competitive and have a greater chance of being the top candidate. In this instance, the second most qualified candidate on a senator's slate who would likely be the most qualified on his local congressman's slate, not competitive in the national pool, unless, he pursues the local nomination, has just lost out. Bottom line. Unless an appointment can be made from a nomination, it is worthless. A candidate may be competitive on some slates and not on others. By and large, the candidate will not know which of these slates he is competive on and which he is not. In many cases no one knows until the end of the cycle when things are being finalized. The catalog states to pursue ALL nominations for which one is eligible. Follow those instructions.