Mike, a couple of days ago on the ROTC forum this became a topic. Here is the other thread:
http://www.serviceacademyforums.com/showthread.php?t=27438 based off of this link:
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-national/20120827/US.Penn.State.Abuse.Riot/?cid=hero_media
The big difference is the other link gives more detail, including his father's position regarding the matter.
Strine's father is a helicopter pilot and instructor whose 28-year career has taken him to Iraq and Afghanistan. His grandfather is a retired Air Force flight surgeon. His brother and sister, aunt and uncle, cousins — all serve or have served. So it wasn't a surprise when Strine began plotting his own military career as an adolescent, reading the autobiographies of famed Army officers like Norman Schwarzkopf and Colin Powell.
"He was a good cadet," Jim Strine said.
His father said he's not seeking to minimize or excuse Justin's involvement, but contended the district attorney's office was far too aggressive — and his son's punishment far too severe.
"He owns something in this," Jim Strine said. "He just doesn't own what he's got."
Just some food for thought. This position has always left me wondering if his father expected that because his DS was in AROTC he should have received special treatment. I would get his position if his DS was the only one that paid this price, but I don't get it when they all received the same punishment.
Additionally, in this day and age of the military, how is Dad thought that even if he received a slap on the rest by the DA how it would equate to him not being dis-enrolled. Cadets that even get a speeding ticket must inform the command ASAP. It wasn't as if this was not going to become an issue from a ROTC perspective. Thus, if he feels that the penalty for his actions cost his son's career chances, he really needs to IMPO back it up and realize the actions, not the penalty was what really cost his son his career.
He got a 30 day jail sentence, and 8500 court costs. The bigger bill is coming now which is repaying the 34K in ROTC scholarship to the Army. 42.5K because he didn't have enough common sense to sit put in his apt and watch the other students get arrested on TV.
OBTW, this is one more thing that struck me.
Strine said he didn't contest the charges because he wouldn't have been permitted an attorney, and his testimony before the school could have been used against him in the criminal courts. He didn't challenge the sanctions because Penn State warned him that if he did, he could wind up being penalized more severely. And he said he was never told that a suspension would cost him his spot in ROTC.
Have to ask how a cadet could be in his 3rd yr of ROTC on scholarship and not know these facts. Seriously, did the Cadre not inform him that being suspended for a semester would not revoke his scholarship? Or did he just think that since he wouldn't be attending school his cgpa would still be above the 2.5 cgpa required to maintain a scholarship, and somehow he could manage to still graduate on time.
I spell a lawsuit coming if Strine's comments are true regarding not being permitted an attorney when his testimony could have been used against him in courts. Not an attorney, but if I was a parent facing a 34K reimbursement bill for tuition, I would be finding someone to at least meet with me to see if this is an option.
As ED stated the Joyner aspect was new, so thanks for sharing.