I wonder what happened on this ship?
http://www.military.com/news/article/destroyer-co-sailor-removed-for-scandal.html?col=1186032310810
http://www.military.com/news/article/destroyer-co-sailor-removed-for-scandal.html?col=1186032310810
Golly! I wonder what the "fraternization was with the senior males and junior female
- Thread starter Maximus
- Start date
The CDR. Salamander has an opinion, second blog down:
http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/
http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 236
MAX:
What do we have here a Arleigh Burke class Destroyer DDG-95
Built:2002, not designed or built to house male and female sailors.
Crew: 32 officers, 348 enlisted
Mission: Naval combatant
While on it's last deployment 2 incidents of sexual assault has resulted in the following destruction of the ships crew.
CO relieved of command, career ended.
XO Transfered to different command, career ended
CMC Removed from the command,career ended
(5) Chief Petty Officers processed for separation
(4) Enlisted disciplined, the four enlisted (1) first class, (2) second class, (1) third class all are female sailors.
This ship has just received a kick in the gut and will not be able to perform it's mission with any degree of proficiency. That many of the crew can not be removed at one time without compromising mission capability. For the remaining crew members life is going to become hell. The new CO, XO and CMC assigned by DESRON will be under orders to get the ship squared away and that will be their only mission. The crew will feel that they can't trust their new chain of command. The new shipboard polices that will be enacted immediately will prevent any crew interaction for fear of being reported. The team spirit is gone. crew moral is shot. The ship is now manned by 380 individuals so busy covering their own asses nothing will get accomplished.
Why will all this happen? Mixed gender crews on ships that are designed for single gender crews. In the rush to get women sailors on surface combatant ships the entire process has been haphazard. Take an existing warship bastardize the berthing, remove some of male sailors replace with female sailors. Mix together for 6 months and you see what the results are. In ten years from now it won't matter if the Air Farce can have their pilot free aircraft(drones) why can't the navy have crew free ships.
The best thing the navy could do for the USS James E. Williams is to put an entire new crew all male on it.
Fraternization is the fleet way of saying sexual misconduct it sounds nicer. PC
What do we have here a Arleigh Burke class Destroyer DDG-95
Built:2002, not designed or built to house male and female sailors.
Crew: 32 officers, 348 enlisted
Mission: Naval combatant
While on it's last deployment 2 incidents of sexual assault has resulted in the following destruction of the ships crew.
CO relieved of command, career ended.
XO Transfered to different command, career ended
CMC Removed from the command,career ended
(5) Chief Petty Officers processed for separation
(4) Enlisted disciplined, the four enlisted (1) first class, (2) second class, (1) third class all are female sailors.
This ship has just received a kick in the gut and will not be able to perform it's mission with any degree of proficiency. That many of the crew can not be removed at one time without compromising mission capability. For the remaining crew members life is going to become hell. The new CO, XO and CMC assigned by DESRON will be under orders to get the ship squared away and that will be their only mission. The crew will feel that they can't trust their new chain of command. The new shipboard polices that will be enacted immediately will prevent any crew interaction for fear of being reported. The team spirit is gone. crew moral is shot. The ship is now manned by 380 individuals so busy covering their own asses nothing will get accomplished.
Why will all this happen? Mixed gender crews on ships that are designed for single gender crews. In the rush to get women sailors on surface combatant ships the entire process has been haphazard. Take an existing warship bastardize the berthing, remove some of male sailors replace with female sailors. Mix together for 6 months and you see what the results are. In ten years from now it won't matter if the Air Farce can have their pilot free aircraft(drones) why can't the navy have crew free ships.
The best thing the navy could do for the USS James E. Williams is to put an entire new crew all male on it.
Fraternization is the fleet way of saying sexual misconduct it sounds nicer. PC
Just_A_Mom
10-Year Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 4,774
You are probably right Gunner because male-on-male sexual misconduct NEVER occurs.....
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/12/navy_sexassaults_120109w/
Oh wait.....
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/12/navy_sexassaults_120109w/
Oh wait.....
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 236
JAM:
You can do better cherry picking than that. Info from an anonymous online survey that even the experts who conducted it can't tell what it means.
Come on old girl your slipping
One of their thoughts is that the perceived increase could be due to a increase of gays in the military.
isn't that one of your "mom squad's" goals accepting gays into the military.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 236
That's not news JAM, it's the Navy!
I never thought I would see Maximus join the "mom squad".
another liberal comes out of the closet. SAD
Whats next dogs and cats living together.
I never thought I would see Maximus join the "mom squad".
another liberal comes out of the closet. SAD
Whats next dogs and cats living together.
What? I just agreed with JAM, it's not news
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 236
What? I just agreed with JAM, it's not news
Maximus:
Denial and rationalization are two of symptoms of "liberal addiction".
hopefully this addiction can be halted before any further damages occur.But you need to seek help immediately so you can begin your journey back to a productive conservative life.
