- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 895
Some jobs have an adjustment based on location, based on a percentage of your salary. It's also taxed and doesn't increase with dependents.
Some jobs don't.
Maybe they should just ditch the tax free BAH and do something like that? Get ready for the rude awakening of a 100% of your paycheck being taxed.
Stop BAH and dependent pay and make locality factored in as a percentage of the base salary?
And you're not talking about "government decisions," you're talking about military decisions...
Good thoughts, and maybe it wouldn't be a bad way to go ultimately. Personally, I don't have a problem with paying taxes at the rate MA or federal government charges. I'm a product of public schools and a service academy in addition to many other of the benefits taxpayers have contributed to, might as well pay my share. As long as I know up front what the deal is, I have the planning ability to manage my own money as I see fit to set my family up long term.
Fair to the gov vs military decisions comment although same sentiment applies. It would still save money for the government if the Army enforced a policy of living on post where space was available across the board. You give up your BAH completely living on your own as a O1/O2 on post, covers your housing and utilities. If you have a roommate, they give you back a little under half.