DHS Secretary Napolitano Resigns

Discussion in 'Academy/Military News' started by Luigi59, Jul 12, 2013.

  1. Luigi59

    Luigi59 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,628
    Likes Received:
    5
    http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-uc-president-20130712,0,83979.story
     
  2. Packer

    Packer Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,877
    Likes Received:
    5
    Don't let the door hit you in the
     
  3. kinnem

    kinnem Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    7,547
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    There can be no good to come from this thread! Interesting piece of news though. You'd think they would pick someone from California to head up their university system.
     
  4. LineInTheSand

    LineInTheSand USCGA 2006

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    8,756
    Likes Received:
    1,004
    This is good news for the Coast Guard (probably).

    I met the secretary a number of times and she's always been very nice, but she was not a good leader, and surrounded herself with idiots at DHS.
     
  5. scoutpilot

    scoutpilot Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    4,275
    Likes Received:
    607
    Water seeks its own level.
     
  6. DHinNH

    DHinNH USMA 1989

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why?

    FWIW, she's succeeding a guy who born & raised in Pennsylvania, who got his undergrad and law degrees from Penn, and then worked in Texas, Minnesota, and Texas again.
     
  7. kinnem

    kinnem Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    7,547
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    Well, we certainly don't do things that way here in NC! :biggrin: To the best of my recollection the head of the NC University system has always been a North Carolinian. Affinity to the state and all that.
     
  8. rkrosnar

    rkrosnar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    676
    Likes Received:
    16
    DHS Secretary....

    This is good for Homeland Security in general. The department will be much better off, now. Hopefully, the President will appoint a true Homeland Security professional. I would guess not, at this point. Time will tell.

    RGK
     
  9. coastiefam

    coastiefam Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    1
    Really hoping for Thad Allen -former USCG Commandant and a fantastic leader!
     
  10. DHinNH

    DHinNH USMA 1989

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molly_Corbett_Broad
     
  11. AF6872

    AF6872 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    237
    Admiral Allen would be my choice. But who am I, just a US citizen with an opinion.
     
  12. LineInTheSand

    LineInTheSand USCGA 2006

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    8,756
    Likes Received:
    1,004
    I like him, but I wish he would have pushed back more during his time as Commandant and during the oil spill. DHS had its way with him. Not that Adm. Papp has been any better.
     
  13. Luigi59

    Luigi59 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,628
    Likes Received:
    5
    LTG Russell "The Rajun Cajun" Honoré would also be a good choice, however I don't believe his political leanings may endear him to the President.
     
  14. LineInTheSand

    LineInTheSand USCGA 2006

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    8,756
    Likes Received:
    1,004
    There isn't a single flag officer I know who has ever had ANYTHING good to say about Honore. Adm. Allen and Honore were not "good friends". The two star in D8 that tackled Hurricane Katrina before Adm. Allen showed up, also said he was an idiot.

    He's good for show or to deliver a one-liner, and he's great at chomping on a cigar, but from what I've heard, he was horrible at the actually response.
     
  15. rkrosnar

    rkrosnar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    676
    Likes Received:
    16
    DHS Secretary....


    This would be a good appointment.


    RGK
     
  16. Christcorp

    Christcorp Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,963
    Likes Received:
    872
    Personally; I'd like to see the whole Homeland Security agency abolished. Along with a lot of other things established after 9-11. It won't happen, but that would be my preference.
     
  17. kinnem

    kinnem Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    7,547
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    +1. I'd add some pre-9/11 things too, like the IRS. Go with the Fair Tax or at least a Flat Tax which should make it possible to greatly reduce the IRS. There's others as well... but then I digress.
     
  18. LineInTheSand

    LineInTheSand USCGA 2006

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    8,756
    Likes Received:
    1,004
    I'm not entirely sure what we gain from the creation of DHS. Mashing a very old Border Patrol with Customs, and coming out with a Customs and Border Protection that is plagued with in-fighting between Border Patrol, Customs and Air and Marine...

    Slicing INS, and creating ICE (which had a different, clearer name that the FBI objected to... aka more turf issues from the "doesn't play well with others FBI").

    Coast Guard and Secret Service came over fully intact.

    And after mashing up other organizations like FEMA and USCIS, DHS kept pushing a "One DHS" without realizing that 200 year old organizations already have an identity, and it doesn't always jive with the one a 10 year old organization of underqualified politicals is pushing.

    It's like asking the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force to give up their identities to be "One DOD"... and some of those DHS agencies are just as old with just as proud histories.

    DHS is a mess. It's a miserable organization and it hasn't lived up to the orginal intent.
     
  19. kinnem

    kinnem Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    7,547
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    I agree. Just wanted to add my recollection that the reason for it was to improve communication and get these orgs in the same chain of command (to improve responsibility and communication). I can't speak to how well it achieved its goals but at the same time I believe that any organization, as it gets larger and larger, gets more and more sclerotic.
     

Share This Page