BlueSteel28
5-Year Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2014
- Messages
- 13
Blue Steel … My Bad! I thought you were asking a question. From your numerous posts it seemed to me like you were trying to make an argumentative statement! I was mis-lead because of the accusations made of KP for making a “contradictive statement.” Usually when someone doesn’t understand an answer, one asks for clarification … not make “accusations of contradictions.” I’m glad you are now satisfied and the arguments are finished.
KP … your insights are most appreciative! Please keep posting! Could you also share your observations / opinions of the differentiation between the deck officers progressions compared with engineering?
Soccerkeeper, thank you for your input, but obviously my "numerous posts" were necessary in order to come to an ultimate resolution.
My original post in response to KpEngineer was "I think I finally figured out what you were trying to say, but I believe you contradicted yourself when you started out by saying it is easier to go from offshore to inland than vice versa?? "
Yes, I was calling out KPEngineer for contradicting himself, but how in anyway was my tone harsh or argumentative? If that is not asking for clarification then I dont know what is.
And in regards to your latest question, you need to be more specific .. inland, offshore, or deep sea? What area, or sector of the industry? Union or private company?