Luigi59
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2007
- Messages
- 4,566
Rather troubling. The Pentagon IG says "yes" while the Army is holding out with a "no."
http://www.militarytimes.com/articl...Army-No-improper-relationship-West-Point-head
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...0766b8-9e16-11e2-94d6-bf62983d455b_story.html
http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/post...ndent_gen_huntoon_guilty_of_a_honor_violation
WEST POINT, N.Y. — The Pentagon’s inspector general said Monday an investigation found the U.S. Military Academy’s superintendent engaged in unspecified misconduct, while the Army said the probe cleared him of having an improper relationship.
Bridget Serchak, a spokeswoman for the Department of Defense’s inspector general, said reports of investigations that substantiate senior official misconduct are made available through the Freedom of Information Act.
http://www.militarytimes.com/articl...Army-No-improper-relationship-West-Point-head
In addition, documents obtained by The Washington Post under the Freedom of Information Act show that the Pentagon’s inspector general upheld misconduct allegations against two Army lieutenant generals last year: David H. Huntoon Jr., the superintendent of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point; and Joseph F. Fil Jr., a former commander in South Korea and Iraq. Neither episode had previously been disclosed by the Pentagon.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...0766b8-9e16-11e2-94d6-bf62983d455b_story.html
The Washington Post found out through a FOIA request that the Defense Department inspector general did find some wrongdoing. So it appears to me that General Huntoon misled me when he told me in January that "there's no investigation here."
Which leads to the question: Are cadets held to a higher standard of conduct than superintendents?
http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/post...ndent_gen_huntoon_guilty_of_a_honor_violation