- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 9,295
:::takes a bow:::
This is good stuff! But I think the regiment has to rise up and NOT the parents.
DING DING!
(I know I'm not a KPer)... but if midshipmen hate this new policy, why don't they all not ring the bell.... and then ring it later at the non-designated time?
I was a 2/c cadet in an constitutional law class at CGA. There were also 1/c in the class and one 3/c (a rather idiotic 3/c who would not graduate two year later). After a number of week the seating just fell into place. It wasn't "assigned"...but people sat in the same spot.
Then one day the 3/c sits in a 1/c's seat. The 1/c came in and said "you're in my seat 3/c BLAH". The 3/c said "there aren't assigned seats" and the conversation started with basically evolved into the entire class saying "3/c move".
In comes Commander XXXX, we came to attention and the commander says "seats" But no one sits. The commander looks up after about 5 seconds, at the entire class standing... and he says "um, what's going on"
Someone says "3/c XXXX is in the wrong seat."
The commander looked over, "3/c XXXX move."
Problem solved, everyone sat.
If the midshipmen don't want to ring the bell under these conditions, and there is a tradition of light civil disobedience....then why don't all the members of the class go to the formation, but no one ring the bell? Then go back together, later, and ring the bell. Heck, want to make a real statement, ring it at night, loud and proud.
Now THAT would be a story to tell 20 years down the road.
I watch the video and it was good to see people so excited.
To change the long standing tradition of bell ringing is cruel, punitive, demeaning, demoralizing and sad. The class of 2013 has been through so many changes that this change can only cause bitterness and hurt. As a parent, I find it disheartening and so unnecessary. The Administration should be in the position to support and encourage our young men and women not knowingly harm them.
I am hoping that those in power can see how much the bell ringing ceremony means to the mids who are working so hard to prepare for their big exam. These mids should be applauded and rewarded.
In the meantime if I could rent and bring to (or near) campus the biggest loudest bell that was ever made. I would. I would then find a place to set it up and let the mids ring to their hearts content.
I believe that our mids deserve and have earned this tradition.
If this ruling stands then I have full confidence that our mids will respect the decision and do what they feel is in their best interest. As long as they are respectful of KP and those in charge they will have my full support.
Depending on what the class does there could be consequences. As long as they don't get too out of hand I can't see them being more than minor at most. In order to "not graduate" you would have to be disenrolled from the Academy. You could receive enough demerits/restriction to get you an empty tube, but you would still graduate.Well noted. My husband has a few choice words about the powers at KP/MARA right now and is quite concerned that any one "not following the rules" could possibly not graduate, due to what appears to be the capriciousness of this new ruling. Could that possibly happen?
KP2013Momm you and I are cut of the same cloth. I have many ideas, but it's up to the mids. I too pray the powers can see how much the bell ringing means to the mids. But eventually, these intelligent young men and women will do what is in their best interests........then, maybe, they will circle the wagons after graduation with some very important people and "make a statement that will never be forgotten" in an effective way.
if the entire regiment is together, what can they do?
I hope NEVER!!!!I am still hoping that those in charge will decide to make this change next year.
They could get stuck and not be allowed to walk. I think that may be a fear. Still working on looking for my own bell. Found a huge 5 foot gong but it is out of my price range and would not get here in time.
I am still hoping that those in charge will decide to make this change next year.
I also believe that any action must be done by the entire regiment, but as we know there is always 1 or 2 that will not.
I'm preparing myself for a thrashing.
But I hope that all midshipmen and parents of Class of 2013 step back and take a deep breath & objectively look at all sides before going out and making a decision about how they want to handle this year's bell ringing.
There has been talk at KP since June of last year that bell ringing would be tightened up (who remembers the pictures of the mid from 2012 that dressed up in a gorilla costume prior to ringing the bell). The class of 2013 knew something was going to be different this year, so although maybe hard to swallow, it comes as no surprise.
So here's my two cents. The minimum payback requirement for attending KP is 5 years in the maritime or transportation industry and a Navy Reserve commission. That commission as an officer doesn't happen until graduation day. Now, would you advise your DS/DD to walk away from formation in silent revolt if the Navy (or other service) were to decide that based on those actions your DS/DD is not fit to serve as a commissioned officer? What happens then? Would somebody in Washington decide that because you didn't commission, you aren't meeting your obligation for attending KP? And then send you a bill requesting repayment?
What about all those mids that are planning on going active duty (about one third of recent classes)? As a senior officer in the Navy, I wouldn't want them. They obviously can't follow orders. I wouldn't care if it was the entire class acting as one; the commission is off the table. I for one wouldn't take the chance; and I wouldn't advise anyone to take that chance.
If the class officers of 2013 can engage KP leadership in a civil discussion over the next 6 weeks and come up with an alternate plan, then great. But if not, I for one will advise my mid to follow the published plan and not risk everything 2 weeks before graduation.
The beatings may now begin.
I'm preparing myself for a thrashing.
But I hope that all midshipmen and parents of Class of 2013 step back and take a deep breath & objectively look at all sides before going out and making a decision about how they want to handle this year's bell ringing.
There has been talk at KP since June of last year that bell ringing would be tightened up (who remembers the pictures of the mid from 2012 that dressed up in a gorilla costume prior to ringing the bell). The class of 2013 knew something was going to be different this year, so although maybe hard to swallow, it comes as no surprise.
So here's my two cents. The minimum payback requirement for attending KP is 5 years in the maritime or transportation industry and a Navy Reserve commission. That commission as an officer doesn't happen until graduation day. Now, would you advise your DS/DD to walk away from formation in silent revolt if the Navy (or other service) were to decide that based on those actions your DS/DD is not fit to serve as a commissioned officer? What happens then? Would somebody in Washington decide that because you didn't commission, you aren't meeting your obligation for attending KP? And then send you a bill requesting repayment?
What about all those mids that are planning on going active duty (about one third of recent classes)? As a senior officer in the Navy, I wouldn't want them. They obviously can't follow orders. I wouldn't care if it was the entire class acting as one; the commission is off the table. I for one wouldn't take the chance; and I wouldn't advise anyone to take that chance.
If the class officers of 2013 can engage KP leadership in a civil discussion over the next 6 weeks and come up with an alternate plan, then great. But if not, I for one will advise my mid to follow the published plan and not risk everything 2 weeks before graduation.
The beatings may now begin.
First midshipman at Kings Point have a history of disobedience against the administration. The cannon on the oval has been pointed at Wiley Hall more times than anyone in the history of the school can remember. The RBU was shut down countless times because of some sort of active or passive disobedience.
Second, if the entire senior class were to actively or passively take action with regards to the "new" tradition the chance on them not becoming commissioned is slim to none, it's a good threat but a meaningless one at best.
Third I'd like to list the positions of classmates and friends from Kings Point that have participated in some sort of protest, disobedience, or revolt at Kings Point to show that those things don't hurt you.
1. CDR USN- Commander Officer HT
2. CDR USN- XO DDG
3. CDR USN- Commanding Officer VFA
4. CDR USN- Project Superintendent SSN
5. Captain Tanker- Crowley Maritime
6. Captain Container Ship- Maersk Lines Limited
7. Pilot - Houston Pilots
8. Pilot - Delaware Pilots
9. Pilot - Sandy Hook Pilots
10. Pilot - Maryland Pilots
11. Pilot - LA/LB Pilots
12. Lt. Col USMC - F-35 Test Pilot
13. CDR USN; XO Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron
14. CDR NOAA - Hurricane Hunter Pilot
15. Senior Partner - Admiralty law
16. Award winning journalist and writer
17. CEO - Internet Start Up
18. Fleet Manger - Maersk Lines Limited
19. LTC USA - Battalion Commander
20. Captain Special Projects Ship - MARAD
21. Captain Tanker - Chevron Shipping
22. Chief Engineer Tanker - Chevron Shipping
23. Captain Drillship - Atwood
24. Chief Engineer - Sabine
25. CDR USN - MSC Operations Officer
I can go on but I think everyone gets the point. PULVER!!!!