Pentagon Religious Advisor Calls Christian Troops “Traitors” & “Spiritual Rapists"

LineInTheSand said:
Ah, so Obama is a radical. OK. I understand now.
Click to expand...

It all depends where you stand in the polical spectrum. Since I don't know much about anyone in the forum words like radical and just about every other hot bottom word has to be taken a with a "grain of salt".

Example (using Chemistry): If Lougi was from the far right of the political spectrum and he called the website in question radical I would say that is like a Ne-1 radical. If Lougi is from the far far left and he called the website radical it could like the charge associated to weak hydrogen bonding.

The energy of a radical is based on the difference of the atom from neutral state. So a Ne-1 radial would be very un-stable and likely react violently with even neutral atoms. While the weak potential of hydrogen bonding could and does go un-noticed (except by was Chem.Eng. trying to maximuize yields)

If you are Ne-1 ro Ne+1 than everything else is a radical to you.
 
One can go the next logical step in this analogy to determine the potential of the atoms:

If two atoms "posters" of opposite charges, but not too far from neutral interact, a small amount of energy is given off (enough to drive converstion)a but electrons (ideas) are shared equally. They may split at the end but that done easily without much effort.

However when two extremely opposite charge atoms post on a thread they generate a ton of energy that than blow apart the thread. Seperating the two atoms is near impossible and requires a lot of energy from the rest of the posters (if they survie the initial explosion).

Happy Mother's Day to all, especially to those with large families (like my mom) who see the above played out daily and did an excellent job of absorbing the energy of interaction and keeping it neutral.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top