TackLed,
The WCS for AFROTC is very clear.
60% goes to PAR (academics), the 40% remaining, minus the PFA are subjective. EC's and recs. are subjective.
Overall, diversity is something the military wants, but like anything else in the military stats are a factor. The military has a % they want for Flag to Field to Company grade. They have a % for officers to enlisted that they want to maintain.
They also have a % of minority that they want to maintain. That % traditionally mimics the % of minorities in our country. Hence if 33% of our society is the minority, and 50% of them are from the AA community, 35% are Hispanic, 10% are Asian, and 5% are the remaining they will try to their best to mimic those percentages.
I agree that for diversity purposes you get an edge, but when you are looking at the amount of applicants that apply, I am sure that there are many, many minorities that are better candidates than the Caucasian applicant and race has nothing to do with it.
PAR btw for AFROTC includes multiple variables:
1. GPA
2. SAT/ACT
3. Rank
4. Course load
5. School Profile
*** number 5 is a biggie. This gives them insight to how the school works. It will tell them if the candidate took the hardest load available. It will tell them if the school hands out A's like Halloween candy.
Ex: Candidate Smith (minority) from an inner-city school, has a 3.45 gpa, 1300 SAT, 5 APs and is ranked number 1 in the class of 300. Top 1%
The school sends 5% to Ivies, only offers 5 APs.
That tells the board the candidate is the top of the top in their class.
Candidate Jones (caucasian) attends the magnet school in the city. He has a 3.6 gpa, 7 APs, 1340 SAT and ranked number 252 in the class of 350.
The school sends 40% to Ivies, and offers 16 APs.
That tells the board the candidate did not take the most rigorous course load like Smith. It states for the school, he is not Ivy caliber from their stats submitted to ROTC/SA.
School profile will also include organizations at the school, such as, sports and clubs. EC factor. If candidate Smith is only in FB on a state championship team because that is the only sport like FB, but Jones is on FB and LAX because they offer LAX, they are not going to ding candidate Smith for not having LAX on their resume. Now if Jones is only on FB, and not LAX or any other sport, they may decide to ding him. Goes back to rigor.
Candidate Smith with a lower GPA, from an inner city school, got in not because of his skin color, but because he was a better candidate.
AFROTC is also very different than AROTC and NROTC. They do not care about the college an applicant is applying to for admission. AROTC and NROTC does, which places an additional wrinkle in the equation. Some colleges like Howard, has minority of their students that are white, while the majority are minority. That means for the minority student it actually could be a negative regarding the scholarship, because the majority would be minorities, and as we all know AROTC scholarships are tied to the ROTC unit.
As Clarkson stated, the minute you try to play the system will be the minute you drew the short straw.
AFROTC and AROTC scholarships are only alike due to the fact they are scholarships for ROTC. If we start inferring to posters that their boards act in tandem with the same basic regs regarding selection we hurt each other with the fact they both have variables and will follow their branch's needs.