I'm pretty sure this article will get talked about at length.
My only questions is that the article doesn't much discuss the nature of The Shooter's retirement (voluntary?) I could see the "I'm screwed" if his retirement were other than voluntary. Regardless, you'd think that special ops personnel should get similar protection afforded to our intelligence personnel.
Those of you who can read between the lines or provide more information, please do.
Here's the link.
http://www.esquire.com/features/man-who-shot-osama-bin-laden-0313
For all of our younger members, this is probably as good of an insight as to the thinking of special ops folks as you are going to get in a public forum.
My only questions is that the article doesn't much discuss the nature of The Shooter's retirement (voluntary?) I could see the "I'm screwed" if his retirement were other than voluntary. Regardless, you'd think that special ops personnel should get similar protection afforded to our intelligence personnel.
Those of you who can read between the lines or provide more information, please do.
Here's the link.
http://www.esquire.com/features/man-who-shot-osama-bin-laden-0313
For all of our younger members, this is probably as good of an insight as to the thinking of special ops folks as you are going to get in a public forum.