Well there goes Roe v. Wade.
you act like that's a bad thing
Stealth, maybe y'all should close this before it goes much further down the abortion rabbit hole?
...Yes...?Is a pro life or pro choice a discussion about politics or morality?
Folks, please remember one salient point here; and Stealth81 was being gentle when he said what he did: you are guests of this forum. While its the practice of SA Forums to, as Stealth81 put it, be more "lenient" on what is discussed in the "Off Topic" forum, these forums are not here to bash/batter/proselytize to other members about topics that belong in a different setting. A discussion about the retirement of a SCOTUS justice is fine, going over the questions and concerns of that seat and its vacancy is fine, but quickly devolving off course to specific and controversial topics that have, and will, generate angst/anger/animosity will only take this in the wrong direction. That is something we don't need here.Stealth, maybe y'all should close this before it goes much further down the abortion rabbit hole?
This is off topic forum. Not even giving folks chance to discuss something is censorship.
Is a pro life or pro choice a discussion about politics or morality?
Folks, please remember one salient point here; and Stealth81 was being gentle when he said what he did: you are guests of this forum. While its the practice of SA Forums to, as Stealth81 put it, be more "lenient" on what is discussed in the "Off Topic" forum, these forums are not here to bash/batter/proselytize to other members about topics that belong in a different setting. A discussion about the retirement of a SCOTUS justice is fine, going over the questions and concerns of that seat and its vacancy is fine, but quickly devolving off course to specific and controversial topics that have, and will, generate angst/anger/animosity will only take this in the wrong direction. That is something we don't need here.Stealth, maybe y'all should close this before it goes much further down the abortion rabbit hole?
This is off topic forum. Not even giving folks chance to discuss something is censorship.
Is a pro life or pro choice a discussion about politics or morality?
Lastly: censorship. Is politely advising a forum that a topic they're opening is best left closed as it has serious potential to spiral out of control rapidly and cause problems, censorship? Maybe. I'd call it being a good netizen (archaic word from an old guy) and simply asking people that are guests to be kind to one another and perhaps to avoid some topics that just are too volatile for an informative forum like this. Remember...we're all guests of the SA Forum's host.
Steve
The real intersting part is no matter what you think of Trump and no matter how you think he is doing as a President, his election will determine the future of this country for the next forty years. His selection of these court justices will have long term remifications. The last selection wasnt as critical and he was replacing one conservative with another conservative justice. This selection replaces the swing vote which is insane. The kicker would be if Ginsburg dies , retires or gets sick before the end of Trumps four years. Trump depending on the election may not have the luxury of appointing a conservative to the job, but the person wouldnt be a liberal either. She is hugely politcial which they all are and from what I hear, the only way she is leaving would be feet first