- Joined
- Jun 30, 2016
- Messages
- 725
he's back in the paper, this time making himself out to be the victim
https://www.capitalgazette.com/opin...0190825-ac4w5umjvve7xc3nmvapi6voee-story.html
he seems to be doubling down on his criticisms and going from "SA's are no better that ROTC, etc, or not cost effective, etc" to stating that SA's "do not make a positive contribution to defense"
in my opinion, some of his criticisms are valid, and it's true the the Navy doesn't like to hear it, but it's hard to understand what his motivation is
https://www.capitalgazette.com/opin...0190825-ac4w5umjvve7xc3nmvapi6voee-story.html
he seems to be doubling down on his criticisms and going from "SA's are no better that ROTC, etc, or not cost effective, etc" to stating that SA's "do not make a positive contribution to defense"
in my opinion, some of his criticisms are valid, and it's true the the Navy doesn't like to hear it, but it's hard to understand what his motivation is