USMA grad, a Communist?

I had some pretty liberal classmates. I also knew/know liberal officers from every branch.... so don’t be too surprised someone like this is at an academy or had graduated.

And with that, I remind you that Karl Marx played the markets in England (and didn’t do very well).
 
Reading that sworn statement bothers me so much it is hard to put into perspective; both that West Point graduated someone who outwardly detests America, embraces the values of American enemies, has zero respect for the Army , its officers, or others who dont identify as pro-communist-dictatorship, but also because it is clear that this "mentoring" professor, Rasheed Hosein, was present for all of what was reported and did nothing to support the reporting officer. That guy should just be placed on leave; he should be fired.
 
What happened to the statement? It's on the web, in an article. It's not secret anymore.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/04/e...was-reported-in-2015-for-anti-american-posts/


I was wondering the same thing. I assumed you took it down for some reason.

Not me. My post and two comments about it were all smurfed.
I deleted my comment when your post was deleted because it made my post nonsensical. When prompted for a response for my action to delete, I pointed out that the report was available online through the Daily Caller article.
 
Irony? Deletion of a post on a public forum thread about an Army officer being promoted through graduation after publicly professing anti-American and anti-military views, but relying of "free speech"? I know; this is a forum which has rules, and I get it. Just wasnt sure which rule was violated. I wont stir up more trouble....
 
If that statement is true it’s very disturbing that the West Point COC decided to commission this guy and send him out to the troops.
 
Our senior flag/general leadership can't even manage to court martial and convict a deserter...I seriously doubt much will happen to Rapone, less they get hauled in front of some congressional committee and asked why they are repressing a service members "right" to extreme left wing political thought and propagandizing.

One can only hope that the system will be challenged by equivalency...next year a graduating cadet will have a t-shirt of Robert E. Lee or Jefferson Davis (at least they are USMA graduates...unlike Che..) under his uniform and maybe a Confederate flag inside his cover...I can only imagine the outrage..
 
One can only hope that the system will be challenged by equivalency...next year a graduating cadet will have a t-shirt of Robert E. Lee or Jefferson Davis (at least they are USMA graduates...

and both brilliant men who led an (almost successful) insurrection against the US Government. Just a minor detail.

If "a graduating cadet will have a t-shirt of Robert E. Lee or Jefferson Davis...under his uniform and maybe a confederate flag inside his cover", the only equivalency would be between the immaturity and arrogant stupidity of said cadet and Lt. Rapone.

Unlike President Lincoln I would have malice towards them both and show no charity to either of them...for being idiots.
 
Agree...merely pointing out that "tolerance" of certain ideologies and ones "free speech" rights are severely curtailed when one raises their right hand and takes the oath..in either political direction...

On the other hand, not so sure how brilliant Jefferson Davis was...his infatuation with defending Richmond was probably one of the biggest strategic blunders of the war...severely limited Lee's ability to maneuver the Army of Northern Virginia in the final year of the war....
 
:)QUOTE="cb7893, post: 572602, member: 14155"]I was just showing charity towards Jefferson Davis.[/QUOTE]

A better man than I..
 
If that statement is true it’s very disturbing that the West Point COC decided to commission this guy and send him out to the troops.

I'm not surprised at all. The CoC did what the Board of Visitors and Pentagon lawyers told them to do.
 
I'm not surprised at all. The CoC did what the Board of Visitors and Pentagon lawyers told them to do.

There comes a point in one's career when you might face tough decisions and be forced to fall on your sword. Isn't that one of the points of a West Point education? Yet those in the West Point COC won't set the example?
 
A professor can be put on administrative leave for numerous things...an investigation doesn't need to be thrown in as one of them. So many USMA affiliated people have been sharing articles about the professor on social media and I just find it sad. A man's career and reputation is political fodder because of innuendo and an association with Rapone. Again, just feel sad for the man and his family. I prefer facts to innuendo.
I find this very disturbing. This professor seems to be dragged into this only because of his association with Rapone. I am sure he has mentored many cadets over the years. It is unfair that some sites quickly throw him under the bus without facts. Professors/mentors are rarely attacked when other students engage in criminal/nefarious activity. Hmmm, could it be because he is Muslim? I am sad for him and his family.

I would pause to go out on a limb or feel sorry for said professor.

You might look into the facts of his case. Like the fact that the was the faculty advisor to the female rugby team. My information is from a father of one of those players.

^ This.
 
I would pause to go out on a limb or feel sorry for said professor.
I agree...we are clueless about the facts. My point was he became political fodder. I read so many truly offensive/vile comments on various posts directed at him because he was simply a Muslim teaching at USMA. Just believe that should have no bearing. If he was placed on administrative leave for actions that are being investigated I hope it is fully investigated and justice served. USMA released a statement saying his leave was not relevant to Rapone. If he or anyone is going to be thrown into the social media fire.....I prefer facts.
 
An open letter from Robert Heffington, LTC (ret.), the professor that wrote the scathing statement (which was once posted in this thread) about his interaction with now LT Rapone while Heffington was a professor at USMA.

This one is similarly, um, critical.

https://medium.com/@UlisseRJ/open-letter-to-grads-from-ltc-ret-heffington-659dac71511f

Dear Sir/Ma’am,
Before you read any further, please understand that the following paragraphs come from a place of intense devotion and loyalty to West Point. My experience as a cadet had a profound impact upon who I am and upon the course of my life, and I remain forever grateful that I have the opportunity to be a part of the Long Gray Line. I firmly believe West Point is a national treasure and that it can and should remain a vitally important source of well trained, disciplined, highly educated Army officers and civilian leaders. However, during my time on the West Point faculty (2006–2009 and again from 2013–2017), I personally witnessed a series of fundamental changes at West Point that have eroded it to the point where I question whether the institution should even remain open.
The recent coverage of 2LT Spenser Rapone — an avowed Communist and sworn enemy of the United States — dramatically highlighted this disturbing trend. Given my recent tenure on the West Point faculty and my direct interactions with Rapone, his “mentors,” and with the Academy’s leadership, I believe I can shed light on how someone like Rapone could possibly graduate.
First and foremost, standards at West Point are nonexistent. They exist on paper, but nowhere else. The senior administration at West Point inexplicably refuses to enforce West Point’s publicly touted high standards on cadets, and, having picked up on this, cadets refuse to enforce standards on each other. The Superintendent refuses to enforce admissions standards or the cadet Honor Code, the Dean refuses to enforce academic standards, and the Commandant refuses to enforce standards of conduct and discipline. The end result is a sort of malaise that pervades the entire institution. Nothing matters anymore. Cadets know this, and it has given rise to a level of cadet arrogance and entitlement the likes of which West Point has never seen in its history.
Every fall, the Superintendent addresses the staff and faculty and lies. He repeatedly states that “We are going to have winning sports teams without compromising our standards,” and everyone in Robinson Auditorium knows he is lying because we routinely admit athletes with ACT scores in the mid-teens across the board. I have personally taught cadets who are borderline illiterate and cannot read simple passages from the assigned textbooks. It is disheartening when the institution’s most senior leader openly lies to his own faculty — and they all know it. The cadet honor code has become a laughingstock. Cadets know they will not be separated for violating it, and thus they do so on a daily basis. Moreover, since they refuse to enforce standards on each other and police their own ranks, cadets will rarely find a cadet at an honor hearing despite overwhelming evidence that a violation has occurred.
This in turn has caused the staff and faculty to give up even reporting honor incidents. Why would a staff or faculty member expend the massive amount of time and energy it takes to report an honor violation — including writing multiple sworn statements, giving interviews, and testifying at the honor hearing — when they know without a doubt the cadet will not be found (or, if found, the Superintendent will not separate the cadet)? To make matters worse, the senior leadership at West Point actively discourages staff and faculty from reporting honor violations. I was unfortunate enough to experience this first hand during my first tour on the faculty, when the Commandant of Cadets called my office phone and proceeded to berate me in the most vulgar and obscene language for over ten minutes because I had reported a cadet who lied to me and then asked if “we could just drop it.” Of course, I was duty bound to report the cadet’s violation, and I did. During the course of the berating I received from the Commandant, I never actually found out why he was so angry. It seemed that he was simply irritated that the institution was having to deal with the case, and that it was my fault it even existed. At the honor hearing the next day, I ended up being the one on trial as my character and reputation were dragged through the mud by the cadet and her civilian attorney while I sat on the witness stand without any assistance. In the end, of course, the cadet was not found (despite having at first admitted that she lied), and she eventually graduated.
Just recently a cadet openly and obviously plagiarized his History research paper, and his civilian professor reported it. The evidence was overwhelming — there was not the slightest question of his guilt, yet the cadet was not found. The professor, and indeed all the faculty who knew of the case, were completely demoralized. This is the new norm for the cadet honor system. In fact, there is now an addition to the honor system (the Willful Admission Process) which essentially guarantees that if a cadet admits a violation, then separation is not even a possibility. In reality, separation is not a possibility anyway because the Superintendent refuses to impose that sanction.
Academic standards are also nonexistent. I believe this trend started approximately ten years ago, and it has continued to get worse. West Point has stated standards for academic expectations and performance, but they are ignored. Cadets routinely fail multiple classes and they are not separated at the end-of-semester Academic Boards. Their professors recommend “Definitely Separate,” but those recommendations are totally disregarded.
I recently taught a cadet who failed four classes in one semester (including mine), in addition to several she had failed in previous semesters, and she was retained at the Academy. As a result, professors have lost hope and faith in the entire Academic Board process. It has been made clear that cadets can fail a multitude of classes and they will not be separated. Instead, when they fail (and they do to a staggering extent), the Dean simply throws them back into the mix and expects the faculty to somehow drag them through the academic program until they manage to earn a passing grade.
What a betrayal this is to the faculty! Also, since they get full grade replacement if they must retake a course, cadets are actually incentivized to fail. They know they can re-take the course over the summer when they have no other competing requirements, and their new grade completely replaces the failing one. STAP (Summer Term Academic Program) is also now an accepted summer detail assignment, so retaking a course during the summer translates into even more summer leave for the deficient cadet.
Even the curriculum itself has suffered. The plebe American History course has been revamped to focus completely on race and on the narrative that America is founded solely on a history of racial oppression. Cadets derisively call it the “I Hate America Course.” Simultaneously, the plebe International History course now focuses on gender to the exclusion of many other important themes.
On the other hand, an entire semester of military history was recently deleted from the curriculum (at West Point!).
In all courses, the bar has been lowered to the point where it is irrelevant. If a cadet fails a course, the instructor is blamed, so instructors are incentivized to pass everyone. Additionally, instead of responding to cadet failure with an insistence that cadets rise to the challenge and meet the standard, the bar for passing the course itself is simply lowered. This pattern is widespread and pervades every academic department.
Conduct and disciplinary standards are in perhaps the worst shape of all. Cadets are jaded, cynical, arrogant, and entitled. They routinely talk back to and snap at their instructors (military and civilian alike), challenge authority, and openly refuse to follow regulations.
They are allowed to wear civilian clothes in almost any arena outside the classroom, and they flaunt that privilege. Some arrive to class unshaven, in need of haircuts, and with uniforms that look so ridiculously bad that, at times, I could not believe I was even looking at a West Point cadet.
However, if a staff or faculty member attempts to correct the cadet in question, that staff/faculty member is sure to be reprimanded for “harassing cadets.”
For example, as I made my rounds through the barracks inspecting study conditions one evening as the Academic Officer in Charge, I encountered a cadet in a company study room. He was wearing a pair of blue jeans and nothing else, and was covered in tattoos. He had long hair, was unshaven, and I was honestly unsure if he was even a cadet. He looked more like a prison convict to me. When I questioned what he was doing there, he remained seated in his chair and sneered at me that he “was authorized” because he was a First Class cadet. I proceeded to correct him and then reported him to the chain of command the next morning. Later that day I received an email from the Brigade Tactical Officer telling me to “stay in my lane.”
I know many other officers receive the same treatment when attempting to make corrections. It is extremely discouraging when the response is invariably one that comes to the defense of the cadet.
That brings me to another point: cadets’ versions of stories are always valued more highly by senior leaders than those of commissioned officers on the staff and faculty. It is as if West Point’s senior leaders believe their job is to “protect” cadets from the staff and faculty at all costs. This might explain why the faculty’s recommendations are ignored at the Academic Boards, why honor violations are ignored (and commissioned officers are verbally abused for bringing them to light), and why cadets always “win” when it comes to conduct and disciplinary issues.
It seems that the Academy’s senior leaders are intimidated by cadets.
During my first tour on the faculty (I was a CPT at the time), I noticed that 4th class cadets were going on leave in civilian clothes when the regulation clearly stated they were supposed to be wearing a uniform. During a discussion about cadet standards between the BTO and the Dept. of History faculty, I asked why plebes were going on leave in civilian clothes. His answer astonished me: “That rule is too hard to enforce.”
Yet West Point had no problem enforcing that rule on me in the mid-1990s. I found it impossible to believe that the several hundred field grade officers stationed at West Point could not make teenagers wear the uniform. This anecdote highlights the fact that West Point’s senior leaders lack not the ability but the motivation to enforce their will upon the Corps of Cadets. This brings me to the case of now-2LT Spenser Rapone. It is not at all surprising that the Academy turned a blind eye to his behavior and to his very public hatred of West Point, the Army, and this nation. I knew at the time I wrote that sworn statement in 2015 that he would go on to graduate.
It is not so much that West Point’s leadership defends his views (Prof. Hosein did, however); it is that West Point’s senior leaders are infected with apathy: they simply do not want to deal with any problem, regardless of how grievous a violation of standards and/or discipline it may be. They are so reticent to separate problematic cadets (undoubtedly due to the “developmental model” that now exists at USMA) that someone like Rapone can easily slip through the cracks. In other words, West Point’s leaders choose the easier wrong over the harder right.
I could go on, but I fear that this letter would simply devolve into a screed, which is not my intention.
I will sum up by saying this: a culture of extreme permissiveness has invaded the Military Academy, and there seems to be no end to it. Moreover, this is not unintentional; it is a deliberate action that is being taken by the Academy’s senior leadership, though they refuse to acknowledge or explain it.
Conduct and behavior that would never be tolerated at a civilian university is common among cadets, and it is supported and defended by the Academy’s senior leaders in an apparent and misguided effort to attract more applicants and cater to what they see as the unique needs of this generation of cadets. Our beloved Military Academy has lost its way. It is a shadow of what it once was. It used to be a place where standards and discipline mattered, and where concepts like duty, honor, and country were real and they meant something. Those ideas have been replaced by extreme permissiveness, rampant dishonesty, and an inexplicable pursuit of mediocrity.
Instead of scrambling to restore West Point to what it once was, the Academy’s senior leaders give cadets more and more privileges in a seeming effort to turn the institution into a third-rate civilian liberal arts college. Unfortunately, they have largely succeeded.
The few remaining members of the staff and faculty who are still trying to hold the line are routinely berated, ignored, and ultimately silenced for their unwillingness to “go along with the program.”
The Academy’s senior leaders simply do not want to hear their voices or their concerns. Dissent is crushed — I was repeatedly told to keep quiet at faculty meetings, even as a LTC, because my dissent was neither needed nor appreciated.
It breaks my heart to write this. It breaks my heart to know first-hand what West Point was versus what it has become. This is not a “Corps has” story; it is meant to highlight a deliberate and radical series of changes being undertaken at the highest levels of USMA’s leadership that are detrimental to the institution.
Criticizing these changes is not popular. I have already been labeled a “traitor” by some at the Academy due to my sworn statement’s appearance in the media circus surrounding Spenser Rapone. However, whenever I hear this, I am reminded of the Cadet Prayer:
“…suffer not our hatred of hypocrisy and pretense ever to diminish. Make us to choose the harder right instead of the easier wrong, and never to be content with a half-truth when the whole can be won.
…that scorns to compromise with vice and injustice, and knows no fear when truth and right are in jeopardy.”
West Point was once special, and it can be again. Spenser Rapone never should have been admitted, much less graduate, but he was — and that mistake is directly attributable to the culture of permissiveness and apathy that now exists there.
 
Back
Top