So, not known to you.

This is not the same as it not being a "known fact.". Just sayin'. You seem quite agitated about it.
 
So, not known to you.

This is not the same as it not being a "known fact.". Just sayin'. You seem quite agitated about it.

Not agitated. I guarantee I know far more about the status of the Army Officer ascessions and company-grade retention than the poster who heard something from his son.

Those reading these posts are entitled to facts. None have been posted.
 
I am currently serving; it's not a known fact.

What you've provided is anecdotal hearsay.

However, there is no question the strong job market impacts retention...and recruiting. The sky is not falling.

I am repeating what my son is telling me. He is in a combat arms branch and I did confirm with him that he does not know of ONE 1 LT. who is planning on staying past their initial commitment. This includes WP grads. The current job market is certainly a factor but that is not the main reason. Most are saying the ops tempo is the main reason. Those not in a combat arms branch may be seeing something else. I believe my statement can be backed with fact.... a 98% promotion rate to captain tells me the pickings are slim when looking at junior officers. In the AF the selection rate to Major is insanely high. Check out reddit and the numerous threads on dropping a REFRAD packet the minute someone is eligible. I believe both are due to poor retention of JO's.
 
Sorry, for some reason I cannot get the link to post. John's Hopkins posted a study dated 04/18 showing we have a retention rate of 80 % for males and 70% for females. Compared to the Navy and Marines of 90% and 80% of the same gender and 85% and 80% for the AF. No the sky is not falling and I never said it was.
 
Did you actually read the study referenced in the article? It says that the Service Academy (West Point in the study) has a 6% HIGHER retention rate.

Studies like this often pick and choose the time period - 5 years, 7 years, 10 years, etc. Other studies that look at different time periods have different results but again, even the study referenced disagrees with what the article says. Sadly, the Army/Navy/Air Force/Military Times familyof papers are pretty far from anything that a journalist would recognize. Some of my friends call them the "National Enquirer of Defense Info"
 

So the 2015 article cited Carter (paraphrasing) wanting to update computers and personnel files to better match new officers compatibility and job choice to actual placement while yielding longer retention rates. Fast forward to WP class of 2020 and the new branching process, it happened. Time will tell how effective it may be.
It has also been stated in probably every Academy Day presentation I’ve been to that the ROI of an SA investment by the taxpayers is realized long after a “five and dive” graduate leaves the service. Most will go on and continue to contribute at a “high” level in many different ways to directly and indirectly benefit our Nation long after their commitment.
It’s seems that the same group of people/media continuously pick at the SAs every chance they get to discredit them and their benefits to our military and Nation.
The SAs offer more than just a commissioning source, that should be the takeaway.
 
There is not a single platoon in our Army without a lieutenant.

There is not a single company without a CPT commander.

There is not a single battalion without MAJs serving as executive officers or operations officers...

There are lines of others waiting for their turns in these positions.

Those are facts.

Company grade officers leave the service everyday. Most go on to serve our Nation in other meaningful ways, and they are well prepared to do so.

It's OK.

We simply thank them for serving. They are among the less than 1 percent who does so.
 
Back
Top