So, to provide some context on the sentence from the perspective of an experienced law enforcement officer. The sentence is not out of line with the charge to which he actually pled. While he was charged with rape, incest and aggravated sexual battery, but only pled to a single count of sexual battery. While definitions of crimes can vary somewhat from state to state, this would be the least serious of the charges. I was glad to see the victim was in agreement with the plea. The MSN article quotes her attorney as saying she was more interested in the truth being known than the punishment. Unfortunately, these cold child molest cases are incredibly difficult to prosecute and gain convictions. They occur in private with no witnesses and there is generally no physical evidence to rely on, unless the perpetrator has recorded the acts somehow and that is found. Taking these cases to trial runs the risk of an acquittal. I was saddened to see the U.S Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces found a 5 year statute of limitations for sex crimes in the military. Many states in the past several years have expanded or done away with statutes of limitations for these types of crimes. I was glad he was able to be charged in state court. The conviction should provide the victim with a sense of validation and give her back some of the power and self-worth that were taken from her. Is there a way for a retired military member to be stripped of benefits completely?