Qdog...I "get" what you're saying but look at the words:
"Morale is at an all-time low per my son and what other parents say they are hearing from their kids. I have no issue with toughness and standards but the decisions they are making don’t make sense and go against the type of things that, in my opinion, make the academy special. You can’t wear flight suits on Fridays? Can’t wear spirit patches? My son has been waiting for a long time to wear his CST patches."
Okay, what does this say? The decisions "they" are making don't make sense. To whom? To the cadets? At the risk of sounding callous, so what? A command isn't by fiat, you don't seek the approval of your people, you command. You listen to your staff, you observe the unit, but then you command. Clearly, the new Sup't didn't like what he saw. I know my four-page letter to Gen'l Clark, and my personal sit-down with the commandant didn't please them a bit about what my classmates and I saw, of the cadets during our reunion in September. The cadet wing members we saw, their appearance, and their discipline were a joke. My JROTC cadets were far better and they even asked me why OUR standards were higher.
"Can't wear flight suits on Fridays." So? Are ALL the cadets on flight status performing flying duties? I couldn't wear one unless I were doing precisely that (and I don't mean as a cadet, but as a career officer). "Can't wear spirit patches." Uh, what are those? I could only wear the patches authorized in AFI36-2903 on my flight suit, ABUs, OCPs, etc. Is the academy authorizing "non-standard patches" in violation of that AFI? If so, why?
It's never as easy or clear as it seems.
It "sounds" to me like things got very wrong...and now a tough old bird has arrived and is cleaning the nest. Once it's where it should be, I guarantee he'll throttle back. And then the cadets can earn those privileges back.