Christcorp
15-Year Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2008
- Messages
- 5,380
Well, if you read my earlier post in this thread, you’d see that my son was a “blue chip” recruited athlete. Yet.... he was recruited AFTER he had already received an appointment to the academy in October. But the coach definitely wanted him on the team. So throwing around words like “blue chip” have very little meaning at the academy.Just to add two cents from anecdotal hearsay with absolutely no evidence, I have heard there is a difference between "blue chip" and "recruited athlete" in that if you are a "blue chip", the coach might have a couple of spots (depending on the sport) which he/she can use to influence the admissions process or gain a Superintendent Nomination although he/she may or may not use that influence. If you are a "recruited athlete", the coach may indicate that to admissions and it is worth points on your Whole Candidate Score but the coach purportedly does not have or does not use influence with admissions. You pretty much have to get in on your own but your WCS may get a bump in your total score.
Has anyone heard this or does that seem accurate?
The coaches could just as easily requested a superintendent nomination for any recruited athlete that they wanted, assuming they were qualified to get in, but for whatever reason didn’t receive a nomination. Whether they use the word “blue chip” or not is irrelevant.
For my son, it wasn’t until the recruiting coach, who happened to be the recruiter for our state, saw a flood of newspaper articles and tv spots about my son, his team winning state championship, etc. that he contacted my son and I. Prior to that, it was the normal go to the athletics website and fill out the form for interested athletes to the academy. And when he called and wanted to meet, he knew my son already had an appointment. But he still threw around the word blue chip a lot.