Cadets instructed by USAFA leadership not to use words like "Mom" and "Dad"

I liken this to a briefing we sat through for etiquette and how to be polite and not get an honor violation when asked by a host if you liked the dinner they cooked. Using phrases like "it was unique" or "that was quite a mix of flavors" or "I've never had it prepared like that."

Situational awareness is something that is taught, and today's times require you be aware that people have different backgrounds. Teaching cadets to be sensitive in word choice is not always a bad thing. That being said, I personally do not think we as a society are at a point where someone would take great offense if you asked about their dad and they had two mom's. It would likely open up a dialog where they explained their background and thus encourage conversation.
 
“The Air Force Academy does not prohibit the use of ‘Mom and Dad’ or other gender specific terms. The recent briefing on diversity and inclusion is being taken out of context and misrepresented; the slide in question was not intended to stand alone.
First and foremost, the briefing centered on respect for others and the warfighting imperative of leveraging diverse perspectives to solve our nation’s most difficult national security problems. Our strategic competitors are doing the opposite. Our American diversity is a strategic advantage and opens the door to creative solutions, providing a competitive edge in air, space, and cyberspace.
The slide on ‘inclusive language’ was intended to demonstrate how respect for others should be used to build inclusive teams, producing more effective warfighting units. Understanding a person’s context shows respect. Until you know a person’s situation, we should not make assumptions about them.
----
Most of you are Moms and Dads, and we have no intention of taking that away from you! Please let me know if you have questions, and, as always, thank you for your support.
V/R Rich
RICHARD M. CLARK, Lt Gen, USAF
Superintendent, USAFA
 
I have learned a lot from these last three threads on admission, CRT, and DEI at this academy.

People are not applying because they are too fat, too dumb, too lazy, too drugged, too mentally challenged with mood disorders, don't love their country, don't want to be in harms way, don't want to take a pay cut when better opportunities avail themselves elsewhere, and a few other noncontroversial reasons. OK.

People are not applying because they don't want to or can't take or got poor scores on the SAT and many other schools don't require them now. OK.

People are not applying because they don't want to take the covid vaccine or they don't care and it makes no difference. OK.

People are not applying because they are turned off by or harmed by CRT, DEI, and "wokeness" at this academy. Unlike the other reasons above this is not true. Or it is true but no one really pays attention to it. Or they do pay attention or are forced to pay attention but laugh at it and ignore it in their day to day lives. Or they are lucky to be taught it as an idea and theory but are not being indoctrinated. Or they are being indoctrinated but don't say anything because they know there will be backlash and career consequences if they go against the grain. Or they are being enlightened unlike the dark ages when discrimination against racial minorities, and women, and homosexuals was commonplace. Or they are being actively progressive towards inclusiveness and the current student body reflects that.

I think it's rather clear which direction they are headed but reasonable minds on this forum can (and do) disagree. The "it's not happening" crowd seem to have their heads in the sand as it absolutely is happening. You can scoff at a source and say something is being sensationalized but it is happening. Whether that is positive or negative - well, time will tell.

Navy pronouns video:

Pilot diversity and goals: https://www.yahoo.com/video/86-of-a...heres-why-this-needs-to-change-155046366.html

Updated demographic "targets:" https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/...ers-set-new-goals-to-diversify-officer-corps/
 
I have learned a lot from these last three threads on admission, CRT, and DEI at this academy.

People are not applying because they are too fat, too dumb, too lazy, too drugged, too mentally challenged with mood disorders, don't love their country, don't want to be in harms way, don't want to take a pay cut when better opportunities avail themselves elsewhere, and a few other noncontroversial reasons. OK.

People are not applying because they don't want to or can't take or got poor scores on the SAT and many other schools don't require them now. OK.

People are not applying because they don't want to take the covid vaccine or they don't care and it makes no difference. OK.

People are not applying because they are turned off by or harmed by CRT, DEI, and "wokeness" at this academy. Unlike the other reasons above this is not true. Or it is true but no one really pays attention to it. Or they do pay attention or are forced to pay attention but laugh at it and ignore it in their day to day lives. Or they are lucky to be taught it as an idea and theory but are not being indoctrinated. Or they are being indoctrinated but don't say anything because they know there will be backlash and career consequences if they go against the grain. Or they are being enlightened unlike the dark ages when discrimination against racial minorities, and women, and homosexuals was commonplace. Or they are being actively progressive towards inclusiveness and the current student body reflects that.

I think it's rather clear which direction they are headed but reasonable minds on this forum can (and do) disagree. The "it's not happening" crowd seem to have their heads in the sand as it absolutely is happening. You can scoff at a source and say something is being sensationalized but it is happening. Whether that is positive or negative - well, time will tell.

Navy pronouns video:

Pilot diversity and goals: https://www.yahoo.com/video/86-of-a...heres-why-this-needs-to-change-155046366.html

Updated demographic "targets:" https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/...ers-set-new-goals-to-diversify-officer-corps/
Wow well written. I normally don't read long posts but yours I did. It really is happening and no-one can deny that! Major change like we have never seen before!
 
Diversity and inclusion excludes conservative beliefs.

What stops a chain of command from excluding white, physically fit males from leadership positions, regardless of merit?
You spoke it into existence:

 
"If you are a cisgender woman, a transgender woman, non-binary, agender, bigender, two-spirit, demigender, genderfluid, genderqueer, or another form of gender minority, this program is for you," the application states. "If you are a cisgender man, this program isn’t for you...

Say what???....... There is no way this came from USAFA leadership. This is off the charts looney tunes.
 
So USAFA provides information about fellowships and internships being offered by third party nonprofits?

THE HORROR!

I fail to see how this in any way relates to "a chain of command excluding white, physically fit males from leadership positions, regardless of merit".
 
From the application within a few paragraphs of each other (bolding added):

We’ve put a lot of thought into designing an application that recognizes that talent comes in many different forms, and that people of all backgrounds deserve a better shot at being included, bringing their unique contributions, and thriving in the global aerospace business. Because we are explicitly trying to do things differently – more fairly, more thoroughly, and more cleverly – you will notice that our application process is quite different from most applications you may have previously filled out for jobs, scholarships, or fellowships. We ask you for the normal things you are used to submitting, but we also have a few unique requirements designed to help us identify the best possible candidates from all backgrounds.

But be advised: a few things have changed from last year. After reviewing feedback from our community, we’ve made a few tweaks designed to further eliminate unconscious bias.

People of your gender are underrepresented in aerospace. If you are a cisgender woman, a transgender woman, non-binary, agender, bigender, two-spirit, demigender, genderfluid, genderqueer, or another form of gender minority, this program is for you. If you are a cisgender man, this program isn’t for you

One of these things is not like the other. One specific group is being "othered" regardless of all the happy talk about people from all backgrounds deserve a better shot. While they may be further eliminating unconscious bias the conscious and explicit bias is right there to read. Note that all "cisgender men" are excluded, not just white cisgender men.

I don't see this as an LOL. I don't see it as clever. I see it as blatant discrimination. Several people here see it as good discrimination that should be encouraged.

Not so fast you might say! There are two other opportunities listed for the men who identify as cisgender. If you click on the link you will see that "In order to apply for the Patti Grace Smith Fellowship program, you should identify as Black or African-American." Ok, what about the other men?

Well the Isakowitz fellowship doesn't seem to have as many restrictions as the previous two but you need to answer this essay question: "C. Space Workforce 2030 is a coalition of 30 space companies seeking to improve diversity in the space workforce (www.SWF2030.org). One of their goals is to increase the number of women and underrepresented groups seeking degrees in pursuit of space careers. What type of industry-led initiative would you recommend to most advance that goal?" This is the kind of question that helps make sure the right people get through.

Then there is another linked fellowship on the Patti Grace page - Zedfactor. Who are they looking for? "Zed Factor Fellowship aims to elevate the diversity and impact of the aerospace community. Through internships for top qualified applicants, Zed Factor empowers learners who struggle to find role models that they can emulate. Zed Factor Fellows bring their unique backgrounds and perspectives, as well as technical skills to a community that enables them to reach for, and go beyond, the stars." Not as blatant as the first fellowship but if you think which groups of people have plenty of potential role models to emulate then you know who is excluded.


Speaking of which groups have plenty of role models and another specific non-LOL is how does the Air Force hit that future applicant goal of 67% white down from the prior goal of 80%? Do you just outreach harder? Do you refocus your priorities on targeting? Do you market yourself better in communities with the desired applicants?

Do you lower or drop SAT requirements? Do you set a low baseline for what is considered qualified so that those that meet the baseline can be admitted as qualified and not unqualified or special? Do you have race and gender set asides to meet goals? Does that turn the goals into quotas? How far do you go?

The E in DEI is the answer. It doesn't mean what a lot of people think it means based on the classic use of the word. It is why people can look at these fellowships and say "looks fine to me. What's your problem?"
 
So USAFA provides information about fellowships and internships being offered by third party nonprofits?

THE HORROR!

I fail to see how this in any way relates to "a chain of command excluding white, physically fit males from leadership positions, regardless of merit".
That chain of command comment is from USNA leadership.

It happened.
 
Wow! 53 posts on this and growing...

Participants at USMC boot camp and OCS must refer to themselves in the third person. They are not allowed to choose which pronouns they prefer and/or self-identify. Where is the outrage?
Thank you for confirming my comments above that indoctrination is a real thing. USMC Boot Camp indoctrinates one to be a member of something bigger than themself, there's a very specific reason for what you mention. What is the reason or reasons to begin to minimize the use of words such as mom and dad?
 
From the application within a few paragraphs of each other (bolding added):

We’ve put a lot of thought into designing an application that recognizes that talent comes in many different forms, and that people of all backgrounds deserve a better shot at being included, bringing their unique contributions, and thriving in the global aerospace business. Because we are explicitly trying to do things differently – more fairly, more thoroughly, and more cleverly – you will notice that our application process is quite different from most applications you may have previously filled out for jobs, scholarships, or fellowships. We ask you for the normal things you are used to submitting, but we also have a few unique requirements designed to help us identify the best possible candidates from all backgrounds.

But be advised: a few things have changed from last year. After reviewing feedback from our community, we’ve made a few tweaks designed to further eliminate unconscious bias.

People of your gender are underrepresented in aerospace. If you are a cisgender woman, a transgender woman, non-binary, agender, bigender, two-spirit, demigender, genderfluid, genderqueer, or another form of gender minority, this program is for you. If you are a cisgender man, this program isn’t for you

One of these things is not like the other. One specific group is being "othered" regardless of all the happy talk about people from all backgrounds deserve a better shot. While they may be further eliminating unconscious bias the conscious and explicit bias is right there to read. Note that all "cisgender men" are excluded, not just white cisgender men.

I don't see this as an LOL. I don't see it as clever. I see it as blatant discrimination. Several people here see it as good discrimination that should be encouraged.

Not so fast you might say! There are two other opportunities listed for the men who identify as cisgender. If you click on the link you will see that "In order to apply for the Patti Grace Smith Fellowship program, you should identify as Black or African-American." Ok, what about the other men?

Well the Isakowitz fellowship doesn't seem to have as many restrictions as the previous two but you need to answer this essay question: "C. Space Workforce 2030 is a coalition of 30 space companies seeking to improve diversity in the space workforce (www.SWF2030.org). One of their goals is to increase the number of women and underrepresented groups seeking degrees in pursuit of space careers. What type of industry-led initiative would you recommend to most advance that goal?" This is the kind of question that helps make sure the right people get through.

Then there is another linked fellowship on the Patti Grace page - Zedfactor. Who are they looking for? "Zed Factor Fellowship aims to elevate the diversity and impact of the aerospace community. Through internships for top qualified applicants, Zed Factor empowers learners who struggle to find role models that they can emulate. Zed Factor Fellows bring their unique backgrounds and perspectives, as well as technical skills to a community that enables them to reach for, and go beyond, the stars." Not as blatant as the first fellowship but if you think which groups of people have plenty of potential role models to emulate then you know who is excluded.


Speaking of which groups have plenty of role models and another specific non-LOL is how does the Air Force hit that future applicant goal of 67% white down from the prior goal of 80%? Do you just outreach harder? Do you refocus your priorities on targeting? Do you market yourself better in communities with the desired applicants?

Do you lower or drop SAT requirements? Do you set a low baseline for what is considered qualified so that those that meet the baseline can be admitted as qualified and not unqualified or special? Do you have race and gender set asides to meet goals? Does that turn the goals into quotas? How far do you go?

The E in DEI is the answer. It doesn't mean what a lot of people think it means based on the classic use of the word. It is why people can look at these fellowships and say "looks fine to me. What's your problem?"
to further eliminate????? It's either eliminated or it's not... no? Further reduce, further minimize, maybe, but further eliminate?

My favorite split infinitive used to be "to boldly go." I might have to replace it with "to further eliminate."
 
Next time we go to war with an enemy of comparable strength, it won't matter if we win or lose. The point will be that our soldiers will be more sensitive than our enemies. That is what is really counts. That is why the Ukranians are defeating the Russians. They don't say mom or dads while the Russians do.

I like the comment from the Air Force that we are using our diversity as a strength for national security. I have no idea what the means. Absolutely diversity of thought is an extremely powerful tool that we should take advantage of. I mean if you have ten people each with a different color and culture and they all think the same way, what advantage do you have? Individuality is no longer taught nor admired anymore. What we want is group thought and any deviation away from it is considered evil. Seriously, the military gives lectures on how people are supposed to think
 
Last edited:
Next time we go to war with an enemy of comparable strength, it won't matter if we win or lose. The point will be that our soldiers will be more sensitive than our enemies. That is what is really counts. That is why the Ukranians are defeating the Russians. They don't say mom or dads while the Russians do.

I like the comment from the Air Force that we are using our diversity as a strength for national security. I have no idea what the means. Absolutely diversity of thought is an extremely powerful tool that we should take advantage of. I mean if you have ten people each with a different color and culture and they all think the same way, what advantage do you have? Individuality is no longer taught nor admired anymore. What we want is group thought and any deviation away from it is considered evil. Seriously, the military gives lectures on how people are supposed to think
 
Next time we go to war with an enemy of comparable strength, it won't matter if we win or lose. The point will be that our soldiers will be more sensitive than our enemies.
Again, as is typical of the hysterical responses in this thread, a red herring argument.
Individuality is no longer taught nor admired anymore.
Isn't that the whole point of DEI? To respect and value that your members have different backgrounds and perspectives than you do?
What we want is group thought and any deviation away from it is considered evil.
You might want to look in the mirror.
 
Might be time for everyone to agree to disagree. Opinions are like colons: Everyone has one, and often they’re full of sh*t.
 
So USAFA provides information about fellowships and internships being offered by third party nonprofits?

THE HORROR!

I fail to see how this in any way relates to "a chain of command excluding white, physically fit males from leadership positions, regardless of merit".
Would you be OK if USAFA promoted a fellowship that said If you are a black gay female, this program isn’t for you? Or replace black gay female or cisgender man with whatever your DS or DD happens to be, are you still OK with it?

DEI at its core is great, but in this case, it seems to be affirmative action poorly disguised as DEI.

PS, they weren't clear on whether it's if you are a cisgender man OR if you identify as a cisgender man. What happens to cisgender men who identify as bisexual Eskimos, can they apply?
 
Might be time for everyone to agree to disagree. Opinions are like colons: Everyone has one, and often they’re full of sh*t.
I think it's good dialogue as long as it stays civil. We need more healthy debates in this country (That wasn't directed at you Mr. Fetterman)
 
Back
Top