This is SO accurate. The vast majority of military intel folks I know are not in the field operative business. They collect, analyze, synthesize, sort, assemble, develop, predict, compare, authenticate, correlate, extrapolate, interpret information/data to advise leadership. The ones who do the other stuff - well, you either don’t know they are doing it or if you have a sense they are doing it, they will never tell you and you don’t ask. For the most part, there is a lot of sitting in rooms with no windows poring over data. During deployments, it’s matter of being the on-hand intel adviser to leadership. Important job, takes focus and a brain that can see patterns, pick out anomalies, see Big Picture and Nano Picture.
First of all, kudos to you for doing zero research and doing the ask Siri thing here, instead.
Second, Military Intelligence is an oxymoron. I can say that with some degree of confidence, as I have worked in this field of endeavor.
Well done.
I like my sarcasm, like my champagne, extremely dry.
This is SO accurate. The vast majority of military intel folks I know are not in the field operative business. They collect, analyze, synthesize, sort, assemble, develop, predict, compare, authenticate, correlate, extrapolate, interpret information/data to advise leadership. The ones who do the other stuff - well, you either don’t know they are doing it or if you have a sense they are doing it, they will never tell you and you don’t ask. For the most part, there is a lot of sitting in rooms with no windows poring over data. During deployments, it’s matter of being the on-hand intel adviser to leadership. Important job, takes focus and a brain that can see patterns, pick out anomalies, see Big Picture and Nano Picture.
It is fascinating and rewarding to those who like to work their brains that way, and it is a vital function.Doesn’t seem like the most interesting thing... I’m just on the search to find a career that I truly love so it won’t even feel like work.
I had ZERO exposure to the Intel side of the Navy while I was at USNA and just about the same level over the early part of my career. A big part of that was due to the "behind the curtain" nature of how Intel was treated. To illustrate this, as a senior LCDR, I reported to 2nd Fleet's NATO staff and worked a number of at sea exercises. The Admiral's daily brief which I and the rest of the staff attended included an Intel brief which was pretty good and was the first regularly occurring intel info that I'd had. Prior to that I'd had occasional lectures/briefs on specific subjects but nothing on a recurring basis. While the briefs that we were getting were interesting, there was also a follow on/more detailed brief to which most of us were not invited. By then, I had 15 or so years of commissioned service and it was the first time that I had any real knowledge about what they did or could do.It is fascinating and rewarding to those who like to work their brains that way, and it is a vital function.