If commercial sea year were eliminated

kpbaseballmom

10-Year Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
149
Would like to hear if potential recruits would lose interest in Kings Point if the historical pillar of a Kings Point education - a year at sea on commercial shipping vessels - were eliminated and students were forced instead to go to sea only on State maritime school ships like Mass Maritime, Suny Maritime (with their students), or on ROS ships and Military Sealift Command ships? Would you consider that a "gutting" of the USMMA experience?
 
Would like to hear if potential recruits would lose interest in Kings Point if the historical pillar of a Kings Point education - a year at sea on commercial shipping vessels - were eliminated and students were forced instead to go to sea only on State maritime school ships like Mass Maritime, Suny Maritime (with their students), or on ROS ships and Military Sealift Command ships? Would you consider that a "gutting" of the USMMA experience?
Sea year was one of the to draws for my DD. All hands meeting scheduled by the superintendent for Friday afternoon, 1/6, to make some big announcements. How that sea year is back on, but all indications are just the opposite.
 
For me, when I attended way back in the olden days. . . .it was essential. It was what set KP apart from the state schools (besides no tuition).
 
Today is an important day with regards Sea Year, and, possibly the future of the Academy. If Sea Year is gutted, and the mids are limited to state ships only, I fear for the longevity of the Academy. Reports are that recruitment remains active, and interest is high. But, there is not a final pronouncement on Sea Year yet. My personal thoughts, and it is just my .02, that a permanent change from commercial to just MSC would probably not cause to much heartburn. A complete change, to just state ships could lead to implosion. The need for KP would be severely at risk because it would loose its key training, which contributes to the function of the school. There is so much wrong about how DOT and MARAD are treating KP. They are too numerous to list. but, examples of the pure BS that is going on can be found on other sites. Todays meeting is really weird. Last year the superintendent issued rules to the mids to stop the use of quotes in their email signatures; during the announcement of the meeting he used a ending paragraph which quoted a 12th century muslim poet saying the embrace of change is good, which does nothing but cause mids to opine that some bad stuff is coming down. I have heard many things about what today's meeting will bring, but, as of now none of it is verified. My personal thought is that the Administration is going to throw another poison pill, sh!t bomb just to try to screw with the incoming administration, as it appears they are doing all across the board from Israel to the ambassadors. KP has been a pawn for the state ships, and a sash agenda, why change now. On the other hand, maybe, a slight maybe, but maybe, the Superintendent is going to try to save his job under Chao, and save Sea Year--but I doubt it based on past history. Hoping I am wrong..
 
My DS eyes went wide when I mentioned the sea year and driving 600' plus ships through foreign ports! Yes, today is great news and a much needed level of accountability is a good sign for the future of this program.
 
Back
Top