I would hope someone who took the test is not at a disadvantage. (I also thought it was necessary...didn’t need the score to start the application, but needed a score to be considered for a scholarship but maybe that changed) Simply being able to take the test was an act of persistence, determination, etc. After two tests back to back canceled, my son had enough. When his third date was canceled, he realized a different approach was needed... get out of our shutdown state. We ended up going five hours away to another state. He did some research and found the best route was not to reach out to ACT but to the testing site directly. He stayed in close contact with the testing site until the receptionist told him, “we received the testing packets, we will not cancel.”
It tore my heart out after all the studying and prep work... watching him go through cancelation after cancelation. But to see him take such initiative and be such a problem solver, rather than just accepting it was cancelled again. The entire process also taught him a great deal.
Because schools are so different I think GPA can sometimes be a slippery slope. Unless they changed the interview form, I actually think it would be a disadvantage to not take it because majority of kids would have a 3.0 AND above the 1100/24 score. Then they just need one more line item to max out on points. Without that GPA/test score one, might be more difficult for some to max out. Just my thoughts