- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 6
Hi all,
I am from Texas and I will be submitting my application to my district's Congressional Representative sometime within the next week or two. I have nearly everything done, minus a decision on a letter of recommendation to place in the application.
My school has recently started an NJROTC unit, and I am already heavily involved. My Commander is really trying to help me get everything done and is very supportive. He has been on several Academy selection boards for Congressmen in the past, so I take his advice very seriously. I am also involved in a course called "Independent Study Mentorship" in which I study a career with a local professional, and create some sort of product that culminates my research. This past year, due to studying Aerospace Engineering, I constructed a wing and performed calculations regarding its material mechanics.
So, my Commander feels that at least one of my letters should be from a math teacher who knows me well. On the contrary, I feel that the letter I received from my ISM mentor would be more beneficial. In my own opinion, the engineering I performed on the wing displayed my math proficiency, AND more.
This is the crux of my dilemma, however. Should I follow the advice of my Academy experienced Commander, or go with my ISM letter? Any advice or insight on this matter would be more than appreciated.
-Parker
I am from Texas and I will be submitting my application to my district's Congressional Representative sometime within the next week or two. I have nearly everything done, minus a decision on a letter of recommendation to place in the application.
My school has recently started an NJROTC unit, and I am already heavily involved. My Commander is really trying to help me get everything done and is very supportive. He has been on several Academy selection boards for Congressmen in the past, so I take his advice very seriously. I am also involved in a course called "Independent Study Mentorship" in which I study a career with a local professional, and create some sort of product that culminates my research. This past year, due to studying Aerospace Engineering, I constructed a wing and performed calculations regarding its material mechanics.
So, my Commander feels that at least one of my letters should be from a math teacher who knows me well. On the contrary, I feel that the letter I received from my ISM mentor would be more beneficial. In my own opinion, the engineering I performed on the wing displayed my math proficiency, AND more.
This is the crux of my dilemma, however. Should I follow the advice of my Academy experienced Commander, or go with my ISM letter? Any advice or insight on this matter would be more than appreciated.
-Parker