Thank you for your reply and also, addressing/asking about some of the time commitment questions. I am a college recruit with an offer to play a sport that has a fall season and is Division 3, but not a sport like football. I had D1 offers but know the time commitment with a D1 sport would be too much for me with pursuing ROTC as well.
It was actually this college coach that introduced me to the idea of ROTC versus attending one of the academies. The coach has other players that are also doing ROTC and I got to spend time with them. He put me in touch with a couple of alumni who did both so I could learn of their experiences. The coach even reached out to the college ROTC Coordinator before I did, so when I called the Coordinator, he had already heard from the coach and knew about me. As you mentioned, this Coordinator voluntarily offered to weigh in on my application with the school which the coach is obviously already doing, so I would have 2 advocates. I just wanted to say all of this because I have given this a lot of thought and hopefully I have identified an environment where I can succeed at all three.
I was just wondering as far as the scholarship board would consider, would they look favorably on a scholarship candidate that already has a likely letter to a "stretch" school of my choice? The reason I thought of this is because I have read some posts where the advice is to "list schools you will likely get into," and my thought was because this is generally considered a stretch school for admissions, that maybe mentioning the likely letter would make it clear this is a school I should get into and does that matter to the board? And to your other point, I do mention being a sports recruit in one of my essay answers. It seems like the military likes people who can perform well athletically in a team environment too so thought this was a positive but maybe not?
Thank you again! Lots to consider and just want my application to stand out, as does everyone!