In light of the 2 year sideload situation this year DS has decided to pursue PLC in parallel to competing for the 2 year sideload after not winning the 3 year Navy sideload. Getting a contract to commission is his goal, and while his first dream was to become a Naval aviator he is just as enthusiastic about leading Marines and Marine aviation. He told his AMOI of his plan, who had some very stern feedback on the extreme challenge of getting through 2xOCS and TBS, and committed to sit down for a deep discussion on his plan once he's back at school. DS fully understands he must be totally committed to being a Marine officer, totally committed, to be competitive. His COs have been very candid that grades (2.7) were the only reason he didn't win the 3 yr sideload, so he's comfortable with the PT goals he'll need to set and achieve as a Marine.
Here is my question: Is it more difficult from a numbers/total slots perspective to get selected for PLC, assuming one meets all qualifications, than winning a MO sideload? To be clear DS is Navy option but I'm interested in the differnce (if any) in selectivity between MO sideload and PLC.
Thanks.
Here is my question: Is it more difficult from a numbers/total slots perspective to get selected for PLC, assuming one meets all qualifications, than winning a MO sideload? To be clear DS is Navy option but I'm interested in the differnce (if any) in selectivity between MO sideload and PLC.
Thanks.