SAT Scores?

I believe the ACT and SAT are designed to measure the level of academic comprehension or understanding a student has achieved, which is tells the college something about the kids educational foundation before starting school. It isn't an IQ test, but high intelligence certainly helps with the test, just as it does with getting good grades in high school. For best results on the ACT or SAT have great intelligence a great work ethic, good teachers growing up, and pay attention in class to the extent that you learn everything.

The reality is that the ACT and SAT are but one tool to determine success in college, and I am unaware of any college which uses only those test. Grades tell some of the story, writing samples are relevant, interviews can reveal something, as can other things different institutions may choose.

I do think that the "test anxiety" excuse for a poor SAT or ACT score fails to hold water. That same anxiety could be likewise used as reasoning for getting poor grades in high school, or not being elected to student government positions, or hitting a baseball, or performing well on a CFA. The reality is that high achievers find a way to get it done when they need to. They may study harder under stressful circumstances or perhaps they are so bright and have so good an understanding of the material that they do well enough even with the stress of the situation. Some folks aren't wired or conditioned for stress. They typically gravitate to less stressful occupations, which is natural, and perfectly ok.
 
Frenzy, you're a candidate, yes? It's in the realm of possibility that us old folks have a bit more life wisdom than teens......
Not sure what this has to do with life wisdom. Also, I prefer not to stereotype people.

However, if you think that a high SAT score indicates intelligence more than running a solid business or stellar grades, then you and I differ on the meaning of the word intelligence.
Considering the ability to run a business and having stellar grades are two horrid measures of intelligence, I think SAT scores are better indicators despite the fact that they are a horrible measurement as well.

Working hard can get you stellar grades. Being a hard working individual doesn't equate to being an intelligent individual in my book, does it in yours?

A smart person that is extremely lazy and doesn't do anything is less likely to be able to successfully run a business than a hard working individual that isn't the smartest person in the world. Saying that being able to run a business effectively equates to being smart is ridiculous to me. Albert Einstein probably wouldn't be able to run a business as well as Donald Trump. In my eyes Einstein is the smarter man, but if the ability to run a business equates to intelligence maybe one day Trump will replace Einstein as the metonymy of genius.

What is your definition of intelligence?

Being hardworking is an admirable trait, arguably even a better one to have than being intelligent. But I don't see how
being hardworking can equate to being intelligent.

In the long run of life, an SAT score means little.
So attending a service academy means little in the long run in life? An SAT score can make the difference between attending a service academy and not attending a service academy. That is fairly significant if you ask me. This test can change the trajectory of your life. If SAT scores mean little in the long run of life, very few things(if any things) mean anything in the long run of life.
 
Last edited:
Not sure what this has to do with life wisdom. Also, I prefer not to stereotype people.


Considering the ability to run a business and having stellar grades are two horrid measures of intelligence, I think SAT scores are better indicators despite the fact that they are a horrible measurement as well.

Working hard can get you stellar grades. Being a hard working individual doesn't equate to being an intelligent individual in my book, does it in yours?

A smart person that is extremely lazy and doesn't do anything is less likely to be able to successfully run a business than a hard working individual that isn't the smartest person in the world. Saying that being able to run a business effectively equates to being smart is ridiculous to me. Albert Einstein probably wouldn't be able to run a business as well as Donald Trump. In my eyes Einstein is the smarter man, but if the ability to run a business equates to intelligence maybe one day Trump will replace Einstein as the metonymy of genius.

What is your definition of intelligence?

Being hardworking is an admirable trait, arguably even a better one to have than being intelligent. But I don't see how
being hardworking can equate to being intelligent.


So attending a service academy means little in the long run in life? An SAT score can make the difference between attending a service academy and not attending a service academy. That is fairly significant if you ask me. This test can change the trajectory of your life. If SAT scores mean little in the long run of life, very few things(if any things) mean anything in the long run of life.

I'm out. Best wishes to you in your pursuits.
 
NCCandidate, I would suggest that if you do not get in this year that you of course reapply and take the SAT as many times you can. My experiences, had an average of 600 on each sections. I was frustrated that there was a discrepancy between my high GPA and ranking and my test scores. That year and throughout the next, I test prepped and timed myself on one section each day. Figured out that I had to focus on one section more than the other like math and I ended up doing better in terms of superscore. 600->760 math while my reading stayed relatively the same. The next time, I focused on critical reading: 600->700. I wouldn't advise you to totally neglect the other section, but just review a little. Doesn't sound like the best strategy but it's worked for me and superscore is what they look at. My portal shows about 6 different test dates. I've been advised to take the SAT as many times as I can, and I also took a free SAT because of that nationwide mistake on the test. Good luck!
 
Practice makes perfect. Not trying to sound pompous but previous on the math section I always had plenty wrong or omitted. By the time I self studied, I looked at how much I got wrong and it was only one question. Not sure how one mistake lowered my score to 760 but I guess it was the scores of everyone else that day.
 
NCCandidate, I would suggest that if you do not get in this year that you of course reapply and take the SAT as many times you can. My experiences, had an average of 600 on each sections. I was frustrated that there was a discrepancy between my high GPA and ranking and my test scores. That year and throughout the next, I test prepped and timed myself on one section each day. Figured out that I had to focus on one section more than the other like math and I ended up doing better in terms of superscore. 600->760 math while my reading stayed relatively the same. The next time, I focused on critical reading: 600->700. I wouldn't advise you to totally neglect the other section, but just review a little. Doesn't sound like the best strategy but it's worked for me and superscore is what they look at. My portal shows about 6 different test dates. I've been advised to take the SAT as many times as I can, and I also took a free SAT because of that nationwide mistake on the test. Good luck!
Hi there does your SA portal show six dates you have taken SAT?? How is WCS differ for a student who took SAT once & got perfect score compare to someone who might hv taken 8 times to get perfect score? Are the two candidates considered equal with all else being equal??
 
Portal shows high sub scores. We were told that there is zero negative connotation for taking the exam as many times as possible. My son took ACT 4 times. Improved his superscore each time.
 
Hi there does your SA portal show six dates you have taken SAT?? How is WCS differ for a student who took SAT once & got perfect score compare to someone who might hv taken 8 times to get perfect score? Are the two candidates considered equal with all else being equal??

You have an LOA and a nom, right? A principal nom to boot! You're good to go!
 
Back
Top