Whistle, Let's clear up two things. First off you state: "And all from one quick to tell us how disappointed he seems to be when he's challenged and has no response aside from "I said so"." I have sent you several PMs over the last few days, first off to apologize for anything I might have done to set you off like this and secondly, to try to establish some meaningful dialogue on our differences in relation to the SATs. You have ignored them.
Secondly, you keep refering to my "expertise based on 3 cases of observation". If you will go back and read that post you will see where I stated that "this year was not atypical". What part of that statement are you having trouble comprehending?
Now let's get to your last posting. You have continually attacked me for making conclusions based on insufficient evidence. Yet, based on a few short forum posts, you have concluded the following about me:
A. You have judged my moral and ethical fiber.
B. You have analyzed my abilities as a Naval Officer.
C. You have provided a complete psychological profile.
D. You have given me a report on my abilities to succeed in the "plebe corps", whatever that is.(I did survive plebe year. You haven't)
E. You have graded my knowledge of the SAT program.
F. You have provided me with a professional analysis of my abilities to succeed in the job market given my military background.
G. You have provided me with my annual teaching evaluation.
H. Lastly, you have supplemented the local Educational Board on coursework required for my certificate renewal.
After you have grasped the incongruities of your actions thus far, feel free to respond to your PMs so that we may continue our discussion off-board.
Somehow, I have the tendency to think that this is not about the SATs , but some other agenda and I am playing a game for which I do not know the rules. Have a good day.
PS: What the heck is a dose of chronic picking?