That and three dollars will get you a cup of coffee.DD got 2 nominations for USAFA which we heard about soon after the interviews. Her application now shows that she received a letter of recommendation from the senator who didn't give her a nomination. Any ideas what that means?
The question I was replying to asked what a "letter of recommendation" from a senator in lieu of a nomination means - its means absolutely nothing. Not sure what attitude you are inferring - facts are facts - it is meaningless. If the senator wanted to, they could have included the kid on the slate. This letter of recommendation reeks of a feel good maneuver to save face with the kids who don't get a nom. Costs nothing, but makes people feel good, even though they didn't get what they want. Perfect tool for an elected official.Nice attitude....
Possible that senators in your state share slate information and do not double nominate. It is my understanding that admissions knows this information. Senator‘s letter might a gesture letting admissions know that he would have also nominated candidate if this policy wasn’t in place. How much weight that carries is anyone’s guess.DD got 2 nominations for USAFA which we heard about soon after the interviews. Her application now shows that she received a letter of recommendation from the senator who didn't give her a nomination. Any ideas what that means?
I think if the "no duplication" policy was spelled out as the reason for the letter, it might carry some weight. But then, no elected official must conform to the policy. They can choose to double nominate.Possible that senators in your state share slate information and do not double nominate. It is my understanding that admissions knows this information. Senator‘s letter might a gesture letting admissions know that he would have also nominated candidate if this policy wasn’t in place. How much weight that carries is anyone’s guess.
“That and $3...”, to me, comes across as very snarky. If sneakiness unintended, my apologies. I fully understand the point you were trying to make, but there are many ways to make said point.The question I was replying to asked what a "letter of recommendation" from a senator in lieu of a nomination means - its means absolutely nothing. Not sure what attitude you are inferring - facts are facts - it is meaningless. If the senator wanted to, they could have included the kid on the slate. This letter of recommendation reeks of a feel good maneuver to save face with the kids who don't get a nom. Costs nothing, but makes people feel good, even though they didn't get what they want. Perfect tool for an elected official.
Snark and humor may not be identical twins, but they are certainly kissing cousins.“That and $3...”, to me, comes across as very snarky. If sneakiness unintended, my apologies. I fully understand the point you were trying to make, but there are many ways to make said point.