- Joined
- Apr 9, 2017
- Messages
- 9,396
Was this one you had marked them for a win?17-7 Navy
38-14 Navy. That’s got to feel good….
Was this one you had marked them for a win?17-7 Navy
There shouldn't be a need for a protection detail of any kind, as after the falcon-napping which ended in aPut Fagot in charge of protection detail or something.
There shouldn't be a need for a protection detail of any kind, as after the falcon-napping which ended in a
fatal injury, there was a formal agreement between the institutions that the live mascots were untouchable.
Anyone who has followed my posts on SAF for a while knows that I'm all for spirit missions and rubbing our
opposing SA's noses with some mud but this area was put off limits, no ifs ands or buts.
After the bugled attempt to get the goat, I saw that the Supe of West Point reiterated that this was NOT
an option but I have heard nothing about prosecution of the guilty so I'm just assuming that cadets are
allowed to just disobey orders from a three star general at this point.
The formal MOU/MOA (memorandum of understanding of agreement) for animal mascots being off-limits has been around for decades now. It was one of the first things briefed to me when I went to USNA for duty.They had a formal agreement back in 92 i thought and hasn't seemed to stop it, but hopefully this one will work. To your point about prosecution, punishment severity will/would be the best prevention measure.
I stand corrected but my larger point remains. There is an agreement and in 2021, despite the agreement there was a violation by USMA cadets. The USMA superintendent said what seemed to be the right words but somehow, shortly afterward USMA cadets again violated the agreement.The formal MOU/MOA (memorandum of understanding of agreement) for animal mascots being off-limits has been around for decades now. It was one of the first things briefed to me when I went to USNA for duty.
It is routinely ignored, and with internet instant coverage of everything, I fear a permanent stain could land on an SA if some horrible image of a really bad outcome got out there. There would be an outcry for UCMJ level punishment involving cruelty to an animal. Heads would roll, not just midshipmen or cadets, but those accountable for making clear this is unacceptable behavior.
In the interests of fairness, Aurora at USAFA was not fatally injured, but no animal deserved the treatment she received, though likely done out of ignorance of falconry.
Aurora passed away about a year later.
Air Force's 23-year-old falcon mascot Aurora dies
The Air Force Academy's falcon mascot, Aurora, died Wednesday, the school announced. The bird, which made national news last year when she was abducted in a prank, was 23 years old.www.espn.com
I saw that the Supe of West Point reiterated that this was NOT
an option but I have heard nothing about prosecution of the guilty so I'm just assuming that cadets are
allowed to just disobey orders from a three star general at this point.
I get your point, and don't disagree,..but two thoughts -his is a pretty flagrant case of disobeying a direct order a