- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,061
Sometimes headlines tell you the blindingly obvious. I don't know who composed this one but if there were any "officials" who doubted this by now, they should be looking for a new job.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...398-11e1-b74c-84ed55e0300b_story.html?hpid=z2
This paragraph is pretty concerning. Clearly there is a balance between developing close personal interactions- which you have to have to build trust and close working relationships, and ignoring security or even worse squelching even the discussion of security issues because nobody wants a contradictory message going out.
"Security flaws"- do ya think so??Afghan recruit training is halted as NATO officials concede security flaws
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...398-11e1-b74c-84ed55e0300b_story.html?hpid=z2
This paragraph is pretty concerning. Clearly there is a balance between developing close personal interactions- which you have to have to build trust and close working relationships, and ignoring security or even worse squelching even the discussion of security issues because nobody wants a contradictory message going out.
In other instances, the vetting process for Afghan soldiers and police was never properly implemented, and NATO officials say they knew it. But they looked the other way, worried that extensive background checks could hinder the recruitment process. Also ignored were requirements that Afghans display proper credentials while on base.
“Everyone admits there was a lot of international pressure to grow these forces, and the vetting of these individuals was cast aside as an inhibitor,” said a U.S. official who, like other officials, spoke on the condition of anonymity