scoutpilot
10-Year Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2010
- Messages
- 4,479
The argument has been made many times on this forum that recruited IC athletes bring something to the military in addition/other than just good GPAs and SAT/ACT scores. If you are correct in your opinion then the USMA may soon find a resurgence of IC athletes that would not have chosen the USMA if they were going to be expected to fight a war. Let's hope the US doesn't need them to lead men into combat during their 5 years of obligatory military service.
What a disgusting thing to say. Thousands of young people have gone to an academy for thousands of reasons. My entire class entered under no prospect of war. We all went for our own reasons, and more than a few of us had no true burning desire to go fight a war, myself included. Almost ten years and give deployments later, here I am.
To suggest that someone would shirk his duty because he went to USMA or anywhere else because of the football opportunity is disgusting. It's prejudiced and sad. Why don't you say the same about a kid who goes there to play tennis? Or goes because he's smart but poor? Or goes because his grandfather did? Please, tell me the RIGHT reason to go and I'll show you a thousand graduates who went for the "wrong reason" (like, say, playing D1 football) who did their duties like true patriots when called upon.
Until those kids stop doing their duty when asked, your comments are way out of line.
I hope we never need your kid to lead men in combat because I bet he/she wouldn't have joined without all the privileges of a commission. (Sounds pretty stupid to criticize someone's performance of their duty before they attempt it, huh?)