What not to do on Ch. 16

Status
Not open for further replies.
LineInTheSand said:
You have yet to cite where Navy ships can do as they please. Where they can disrupt the flow of traffic in sea lanes to perform MOBs, while ships with the same authority, however different mentality, understand THEY are responsible for where their ship goes when they're right full or left full at 20 knots.

The chip comes from the "We do what we want, stay out of the way" mentality

Want to have fun on the high seas? Head out beyond 200NM and do as many man overboard drills as you want.

I don’t know why I am doing this. Attempting to help you grasp a rudimentary understanding of the Navy is like beating one’s head against the wall. First, it is futile; and secondly, it feels so good when one ceases. And additionally, you will probably eventually decide the absurdity of your position and delete all your posts anyway.

Getting underway and coming into port accounts for the majority of man overboards. In addition to the obvious fact that more sailors are working on deck, there are several other factors. First is the lovestruck E-1 who cannot fathom leaving the barmaid he has just met after swearing undying love. In the back of his mind, he also is questioning her monogamy. Whether love or jealousy, about the three mile mark, he feels he has to act and heads for shore. Second, there is a particularly potent brew made while underway consisting of raisins and apple juice. It causes one to do super human things. Trust me, I have first hand experience. The last batch is always uncorked the night before entering port. Most who leave the ship before it gets pierside think they can actually walk on water. Can’t remember the name of it but perhaps subsquid can help. And then there is the same E-1 who, not having had a letter from his sweet little barmaid in three months, has to return ashore as quickly as possible just to confirm that she is in a full body cast and, therefore, unable to write to him.

Secondly, it may be hard for someone with a 10’ draft and a mud puddle mentality to grasp, but deep draft Naval vessels are confined to the channel. Even after exiting the channel, there are still shoals which would prohibit a normal recovery. They do not have the luxury of a Williamson turn. Given winds, tide, and traffic, each rescue attempt is unique. A ship’s commanding officer is responsible in all ways for each and every member of his crew, whether they accidentally slip overboard or are an example of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution in action. I would offer that should he lose a sailor in these situations and the board determines that he had never practiced such an evolution, he would be relieved of command for incompetence. Pardon me if I discount the observations of someone who admittedly has a bias against all things Navy but I am most positive the CO of the ship in question was performing the necessary drill in a safe and orderly fashion. He was simply doing what both the Navy and the family and friends of every sailor on board expected of him.

And yes, when driving a real ship when the victim isn't already astern when he hits the water, the first thing to do when there is a man overboard is to kick the stern (prop) away from the victim by doing a full rudder evolution.

Nope, LITS, one cannot practice restricted maneuvering drills 200 miles at sea. As an airdale, allow me to interject an analogy with which I am very familiar. Learning to land is critical to success as an aviator. You are the type who, on a quiet Sunday afternoon, bought the house immediately adjacent to the Naval air station which had been there for 50 years and, now having endured the Sound of Freedom for a week or so, suggests the Navy do practice landings at 3000’ altitude.

I, like most of the members of this forum, unlike you, realize that you are totally unexperienced and don’t know everything yet. Since we do understand, it is not really necessary to go back and delete all your posts once you grasp the absurdity of your position.
 
Last edited:
Well well, I was expecting a little more substance to your response, but unfortunately, that hasn't happened.

I'll take it subject by subject, line by line, so I don't miss any of your non-post.


First, my vessel's draft is well over 10'. Secondly, my vessel won't be using three tugs and a pilot to pull into a Navy base, as do most Navy vessels with the exception of the 170' I saw pull in yesterday (with a draft less than mine).
Next, none of the events I have described happened on transits in or out of port. These were not actual MOBs, they were "now we're going to do something, so stay out of our way." But you see, USNA69, that's not how the maritime community works. I don't deviate from the rules, tell those around me, "ignore the rules, I'll do what I want" and expect everyone to accept it. I understand in your Navy mind this seems acceptable. Well from someone on a SHIP out there...it looks unprofessional. Of course, I'm sure you're not worried about that. I know we all want to believe that these drills happened going in or pulling out, but in all actuality, the same ship pulled in over 24 hours later. No, I'm not saying take your ship's out 200NM if you want to train, I'm saying take your ships 200NM and out of major sea lanes if you want to train without any respect for other vessels.

Your E-1 scenario is immaterial and does not apply to what I'm talking about. Also, with the muddy puddle metality, I understand that many Navy ships are restricted to the channel due to their drafts. The depths in the area that ship was playing in were over 40 ft (yes well over the draft of the brand new Navy ship I watched for two days).

I AM happy that you know the first step to "kick the stern out" for a MOB, that 3/c cadet knowledge. You can practice "restrict manuevering" wherever you are. I don't need an actual mine field to have a swept channel drill.


Lastly, I understand you like questioning my experience, however, these concepts should not only be clear to your Navy O-6s and O-5s out there, they should be very clear to Navy O-1s and O-2s. They are not hard concepts. I assume, although I may be wrong, that SWOs take some kind of Rules of the Road test. By the time you graduate CGA, you've taken the Rules of the Road, open book and closed book, three times. This stuff is simple, so please excuse me for having trouble understanding why you have failed to grasp what is required of all vessels.

I was waiting for your explaination of where it says the Rules don't apply to the Navy...apparently that isn't very easy.
 
Last edited:
LineInTheSand said:
Your E-1 scenario is immaterial and does not apply to what I'm talking about

And your comment, which I am sure was intended to be derogatory, does?

LineInTheSand said:
Secondly, my vessel won't be using three tugs and a pilot to pull into a Navy base, as do most Navy vessels

Ever docked a ship with bow and stern thrusters? Ever docked a ship without bow and stern thrusters? Many ships are designed to be gotten underway and docked independently, including commercial ships, and, I suspect, CG Cutters, and will include thrusters. Most Navy ships, since they are operating out of bases where tugs are readily available, are not designed as such, and do not include thrusters. For the one or two of you who are continuing to read this drivel and don’t know what thrusters are, they are small but costly to maintain propulsion units which perform the exact same function during restricted maneuvering as a tug would.

LITS, sorry, but I am getting a headache following your logic so I am crawling back into my hole. My parting question would be, why do you have so much disdain for a military service who is daily on the line sacrificing and fighting for your right to say whatever you so desire on a forum such as this?

Lastly, the Rules of the Road do not prohibit a commanding officer from using sound judgement. It has been a while for me, but I challenge you to place yourself in the position of the CO of a Naval vessel with the requirement to perform certain drills within restricted waterways. Read the Rules and you will find a way.
 
Last edited:
Which comment would you be refering to, the Puddle Pirate comment, or the muddy puddle comment?

Next: No, no bow thrusters, no Z-drive. I have two controllable pitch props, to pull in I spring on line two...like ship drivers do. No tug involved, just driving on a pier and using lines.


I don't have disdain for the US Navy, I have disdain for the way they conduct themselves with respect to other vessels. As much as I would love to hear "sacrificing" claims, there are US Coast Guard cutters in the Persian Gulf too, and they are plenty of US Navy ships stateside. I'm moored up next to more than a few as I type. My "frustration" with the Navy arrises for many of the same seasons Marines are frustrated.

As for what the Navy has done for me, I appreciate the sacrifice of all members of the military, including the Coast Guard, however, being IN A SERVICE, I can honestly say I do not appreciate the way US Navy ships conduct themselves, especially in US waters. Does that make sense now USNA69. Please, feel free to return to your hole before the headache gets too bad, and continue enjoy the freedom of responding to my posts that are afforded you by the US Army, US Marine Corps, US Air Force, US Coast Guard, and US Navy, and I will continue to do what I need to do.
 
USNA69, you seem to think that this is an attack on anything you stand for. When it was about football, it was an attack on US Navy football players, despite my listing my own classmates. When I create a thread regarding the conduct of vessels at sea, I am in some way attacking you.

For those of us currently serving, especially at sea, the conduct of another vessel is a very real, important, and common occurance. The fact that I have to read "Navy ships are transitting, expect the unexpected when setting up routine arrangments" in the Night Orders from the Commanding Officer, that stands up some of the hair on the back of your neck. It's also not very complimentary from a CO. With the ease that you can say "oh but the Navy CO has control, don't worry about it.", that does not translate into reality, out here. Maybe from the comfort of a computer in your home it does, but not at night with 10 other contacts in the area, while you try to guess which ones are Navy because you need to "expect the unexpected".
 
enjoy the freedom of responding to my posts that are afforded you by the US Army, US Marine Corps, US Air Force, US Coast Guard, and US Navy
Trust me, I do, daily. Lest anyone think I was disparaging the CG, it was simply a little tit-for-tat in an attempt to get your attention. With that said, however, if your attitude is typical of today's USCGA grads and USCG junior officers, I may have to rethink my position. In my opinion, you, in the past several days, have done neither your school nor your service any favors.
 
**** I'll edit my post and simply say the following: ****

I welcome the posts of LITS, a CURRENT officer in the United States Coast Guard.

This forum is much better served by someone like him who is currently serving and doesn't claim to know EVERYTHING. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Assume my regard for Navy shiphandling is on par with many of my shipmates.

I will withhold my feelings regarding your conduct being indicative of your fellow Naval Officers and grads of USNA, one because I know one of your classmates and I respect him, and because I know quite a few current Naval officers who I call friends and respect. That respect is earned. It does not extend across the entire fleet or to you. I don't believe your actions, attitude or disposition are those of the typical USNA grad, and that's a good thing.

You continue to take this thread off of its topic. It was never to question the Navy's projection of power or Naval Superiority in war. I am very happy to have US Navy ships serving under the US flag. I can sleep better at night knowing I have friends on US Navy ships serving in harms way, or good friends in the US Army with the 101st in Iraq or training to fly ANG helos, past classmates serving in Afghanistan and Iraq with the US Marine Corps, high school classmates serving in the US Air Force in Korea, and shipmates, some of my best friends, in the US Coast Guard serving with PATFORSWA in the Persian Gulf.

None of these involve you. All of these are very different from the arguement of shiphandling, especially shiphandling in US waters.

Perhaps if you didn't try to deviate from the discussion, we could get to the root of that.
 
Last edited:
LineInTheSand said:
I can sleep better at night knowing I have friends on US Navy ships serving in harms way, or good friends in the Army with the 101st in Iraq or training to fly ANG helos, pass classmates serving in Afghanistan and Iraq with the Marine Corps, high school classmates serving in the Air Force in Korea, and shipmates in the Coast Guard serving with PATFORSWA in the Persian Gulf.
Nope, you can sleep better at night knowing you have friends, those you don't know, and even those who hate your guts out there serving in harm's way to protect you and that they have been doing it in the past for the entire life of you and yours. Maybe all of them should deserve your respect whether they have personally "earned" it from you or not.
 
Typical USNA69, telling me why I sleep better at night. I don't know enough people to have anyone serving who hates my guts. Don't presume to tell me where my respect lies. I respect a servicemembers commitment, I will not water it down so that it reads I respect each individual person. I respect the act, however selfless to serve. Assume the "respect the rank, not the person, until they've earned it" is the mentality I'm using.

To make this plain and simple. I respect the act of service, however to respect the individual for anything more, takes more.
 
Also, as has already been stated.


USNA69 or possibly SubSquid, can you please cite where Navy ships are exempt from the Rules of the Road. I'm assuming you've read them, but if not I can provide a link.


Also remember, while you think I am condemning your entire service, I did in the first post comment on how another Naval vessel conducted herself the correct way.


But, feel free to rejoin my on the topic that this tread was started on.
 
This forum is much better served by someone like him who is currently serving and doesn't claim to know EVERYTHING. :rolleyes:

As usual, Luigi59, aren't you getting a little off topic here? I was rather enjoying the lively discussion going on here.
Of course there is a lot of ruffling of feathers - that is pretty much what one would expect between men as the testosterone kicks in - not to mention military men. Not that I'm stereotyping.
Let me remind you - this is the off topic forum the purpose of which is:
This forum is intended for board members to chat and have a good time.

Now - back to our regularly scheduled program - I rather enjoy reading how different branchs of the armed services interact and how they resolve "turf" conflicts.

Now - do you seriously want to discuss the merits of each member serving this forum?
If you do then start another thread and we will go at it.
 
Luigi59-

How can I best explain to you Inter/Intra Service Rivalries? It's all about pride and NOT arrogance. Jibes and teasing are not insinuations or degrading. They are an expression of the pride one has for his branch of service. USNA69 and I have, frequently, traded barbs about chicken farmers and bubbleheads. Marines (some of my best friends)are still grunts, mud suckers and bullet catchers. Air Force is still Greyhound Drivers and feather heads. USCG will always be Puddle Pirates and Shallow Water Sailors.

Get over it.

Generational differences do exist but do not negate current/best knowledge. I personally have an affection for the Marine Corps and a paticular dissaffection for the Air Force. Those are generational. I served in the 70's when the Air Force was flush with appropriations and I went to sea, in Fleet Ballistic Missile subs, under manned, ill-equiped and underfunded. That made making your mission even more onerous than it already was. Unfortunately, I'm human and still carry that annimosity about the Air Force with me. However, I do respect their mission and their profession, ill-chosen as it may be(that's a joke, laugh now).

I respect LITS. I believe his yammering about the "Rules of the Road" is a bit tiring given the fact that the Navy spends upwards of 12 months deployed and doesen't have the opportunity of "pulling into the parking lot" every day. We're not the CG or Air Force that usually gets to drive home after a day's work. Those "coming into port" skills may be a little rusty given that we don't get to practice that evolution very often.

Before you cast stones, you need to walk a mile in that person's shoes. Before you declare arrogance and insult, perhaps you should grow a thicker skin. Those of us that really have "Been There, Done That" have thick skins and little tolerance for those who haven't.

I'm sure that your son/daughter will become the same kind of "Homer" with their service as I am with my service. That isn't arrogance. That's pride.
 
Ummmm .....
At the risk of seeming illiterate - what is a "chicken farmer" or a "bubblehead"? :confused: :confused:

You left out the Army - I am assuming you call them "SOLDIERS". :thumb:

(sorry for getting "off topic" - again :wink: )
 
Ummmm .....
At the risk of seeming illiterate - what is a "chicken farmer" or a "bubblehead"? :confused: :confused:

You left out the Army - I am assuming you call them "SOLDIERS". :thumb:

(sorry for getting "off topic" - again :wink: )


Jeez! I'm teaching kindergarten!

A. Chicken Farmer-derives from Aircraft Carriers being refered as Bird Farms. Birds>>Chickens>>those that serve on those very larger targets are Chicken Farmers

B. Bubblehead-An endearing term used by Chicken Farmers refering to their superior brothers in the Submarine Force.

C. Army-You can pretty much call them anything and just get an OOAH in response.

D. JAM-Person that I really think has GOT IT!!!!
 
Chicken farmers are those aboard carriers, aka the "bird farm." Bubbleheads are submariners.

LITS, Navy ships are not exempt from the ROR. However, one may respectfully argue that due to specific missions or training conducted by Navy vessels, they be granted some leeway with the rules.

Rule 2b states "In construing and complying with these Rules due regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision and to any special circumstances, including the limitations of the vessels involved, which may make a departure from these Rules necessary to avoid immediate danger."

Only so much training can be accomplished in simulators and out on the open water. As USNA69 stated above, many MOBs occur when the ship is at S&A detail transiting in and out of port. This probably means that the ship is in a channel with lots of other merchant and civilian traffic. You can't simulate that 200NM off the coast in open water and teach any SWO about shiphandling skills when they can't actually see the natural hazards, shifting currents/winds, and other ships around them. It teaches them to think on their feet.

Besides, it keeps the other ships skippers on their toes and forces them to react like it was a real life scenario. Might be annoying, but when someone's in the water, they are counting on that shipdriver to pick them up ASAP.
 
For hopefully the final time, I would like to respond to ask much of USNA69's past posts on this thread as possible. I've given him too much room to take the conversation elsewhere, but hopefully answering each comment will force him to stay on target.




USNA69 - "LITS, Warships do things that:
A. Restrict maneuverability
B. They do not necessarily want to broadcast to the world when what they are doing
C. Do not necessarily want every ship in the ocean within binocular range

Example: A towed array may both restrict maneuverability and create a hazardous zone astern. Furthermore, they do not want to announce when and where they are doing it. I think there are still Soviet ‘trawlers’ around."


Response- :thumb: Correct! Navy ships DO do things that restrict their maneuverability. In that event, as a power driven vessel, they are restricted in their ability to maneuver. That's not only the Navy though. That also would not be classified as a "crossing" situation that would be a heirarchy situation. Ships will note the light configuration or day-shapes of the Navy vessel and act accordingly. "I'm going to do whatever I want for MOB drills" is not one of those situations, however towing or flight ops are.


USNA69 - "And your area of concern appears to be around harbors while they are getting underway and returning to port. Might I remind you that the movement of US Naval ships is considered confidential and priviledged information. Announcing the name of the ship with every Ch 16 transmission would simply allow our enemies to very easily satellite monitor our ship's movements. "


Response - :thumbdown: Negative Ghost Rider. My area of concern is regular open ocean steaming, which is where the original situation occured. Movement of a Navy ship is not classified and a US Navy ship, outbound or inbound typically makes a "Securite" call using their hull number. Those hull numbers are not classified, and can be found in numerous publications, with the corresponding ship name.

USNA69 - "Yep, that you have a chip on your shoulder against the Navy, that you care nothing of Navy SOP, and that you have no idea of operational security."


Response - :thumbdown: Wrong again. If you remember in one of the first posts, I mentioned a second US Navy ship which took the right action. I even said we had kind words for it on my bridge. It was a tail of two ships, and was posted to say, "don't do what this ship did" while allowing for the fact that another US Navy ship did the right thing. I do not fall under the direction of Navy SOP, and finally I have every idea, understanding, and responsibility to OpSec.



USNA69 - "And then you propose not even bothering to camaflogue ships movements, that they are just going to find out anyway. Somehow I doubt it."


Response - :confused: I don't even know if this deserves a response.


USNA69 - "Secondly, it may be hard for someone with a 10’ draft and a mud puddle mentality to grasp, but deep draft Naval vessels are confined to the channel. Even after exiting the channel, there are still shoals which would prohibit a normal recovery. They do not have the luxury of a Williamson turn. Given winds, tide, and traffic, each rescue attempt is unique."

Response - :thumbdown: My navigational draft is almost double 10'. I have to deal with vessels that have far greater drafts than the typical Navy ship. If this channel is in international waters, then you would be "constrained by draft" not a huge deal, this isn't something unique to the Navy. Correct a Williamson turn would probably not be the best course of action...thinking small boat pick up? That's how we brief it during navigation and special sea detail.

USNA69 - "Pardon me if I discount the observations of someone who admittedly has a bias against all things Navy but I am most positive the CO of the ship in question was performing the necessary drill in a safe and orderly fashion."

Response - :thumb: Call observations biased, I will agree that a CO, in general will act with the ship in mind, it was not near land however he may have wanted to pick an area to being MOB drills away from a south bound cargo ship. A securite saying "get away we're going to be all over the place" doesn't cut it. If you're on a range, on a gunex, sure, that is appropriate.


USNA69 - "And yes, when driving a real ship when the victim isn't already astern when he hits the water, the first thing to do when there is a man overboard is to kick the stern (prop) away from the victim by doing a full rudder evolution."

Response - :thumb: Correct, turn towards the MOB, doesn't always have to be full rudder, considering some high speeds.

USNA69 - "Nope, LITS, one cannot practice restricted maneuvering drills 200 miles at sea. "

Response - :thumbdown: Incorrect sir! I don't need a mine field to carry out Swept Channel drills. You can have restricted maneuvering drills anywhere.


USNA69 - "Ever docked a ship with bow and stern thrusters? Ever docked a ship without bow and stern thrusters? Many ships are designed to be gotten underway and docked independently, including commercial ships, and, I suspect, CG Cutters, and will include thrusters. Most Navy ships, since they are operating out of bases where tugs are readily available, are not designed as such, and do not include thrusters. For the one or two of you who are continuing to read this drivel and don’t know what thrusters are, they are small but costly to maintain propulsion units which perform the exact same function during restricted maneuvering as a tug would."

Response - :cool: My ship doesn't have thrusters, doesn't have Z-drive. To pull in, I typically spring on line two. My ship has twin CPP screws. I've also docked a single screwed vessel.

USNA69 - "Lastly, the Rules of the Road do not prohibit a commanding officer from using sound judgement. It has been a while for me, but I challenge you to place yourself in the position of the CO of a Naval vessel with the requirement to perform certain drills within restricted waterways. Read the Rules and you will find a way."


Response - :thumbdown: Again, missing the point. First, the situation never occurred in restricted waters, it occurred over 24NM from the baseline The Rules of the Road were designed to help with the "sound judgment" process. When you pull out of your drive way, I have no doubt you use sound judgment so you don't pull in front of an on coming Mack truck. Now you know in America to drive on the right side of the road, that red means stop and green means go, and what a stop sign means. These are rules. Sure you'll be using sound judgment during this process, but at no time will you say "hey, I'm an officer in the Navy, now I'll go on red and stop on green and sometimes drive on the right and sometimes drive on the left, and I will disregard the stop sign, but I'll honk my horn as I drive through the intersection to let the other guy, who has the righ-of-way to stop." No you won't do that, because of laws and because it's not safe for you or the other drivers on the road. Consider the "Rules of the Road" to be the same concept. The Rules also allow for deviations from the rules, but it's pretty clear when those allowances are appropriate.


I hope this was helpful. ROTR books are available, it's no secret. I would recommend taking a look at it.
 
Last edited:
KAM - True, it is helpful to do drills closer in. I think a Lov Vis drill is much more helpful where you can shoot bearings than it is in open ocean. Also, the rule you cited also assumes that your vessels actions haven't put you into that danger. All those "shalls" add up. It's not saying "do what you want, and when there is danger, then keep doing whatever you want." It allows for an out if, say a give way vessels actions were not sufficient to eliminated the risk of collision.


SubSquid - Last year I was out 66% of the year. I wasn't walking home each night. I was being tossed around in a ship. I was responding to migrants slitting wrists or migrant riots or MOBs from other ships, or SAR. I also didn't have 6-12 months inport. I think this ROTR stuff is getting to you because it doesn't sound very familiar.



All - It's true there are many inter/Intra service rivarlies, but between the Navy and Coast Guard, to be completely honest, it is one sided.


From my side, I wouldn't not want to be in the Navy. It's not because of the lower minimum ASVAB scores, or the qualitiy or work. Do you ever wonder why the Navy wants shallower drafts and have refocused on riverine forces, or why Frigates have been stripped down? Navy will pull the "6ft tall" joke, call us Puddle Pirates, or Shallow Water Sailors, but in the end, it's easy to laugh it off, because they are STILL in the Navy, and I wouldn't generally wish that on anyone. Do I appreciate the force projection of the Navy? Yes. Are there jokes the other way? Yes.


Q. How do you know if a Coast Guard unit is located near a Navy base?
A. All of the Navy kids are attractive.

US Navy ship, 100 sailors go on, 50 couples come off.

It's always important for the US Navy squids to understand, the Coast Guard is the oldest continuous sea going service. We don't run into bridges.

When I first reported aboard I attended a Navy fire fighting course, which was of little significance. The DCs instructors pulled the normal USN to USCG jokes, which were met with little reaction. At the end of the day an instructor got a face full of bail from a wild hose.


I think squids think Coasties look up to the Navy, like it's our grey big brother. Not the case. The US Navy is like a big grey Lenny, and they are welcome to tend the rabbits.

My advice to the Navy, focus on your jobs, it's too hard for you to do two things at once, and we'll continue doing our jobs, like we have been since 1790.
 
Last edited:
I just picked up on this comment, so I wanted to address it.


From KAM:

"Besides, it keeps the other ships skippers on their toes and forces them to react like it was a real life scenario. Might be annoying, but when someone's in the water, they are counting on that shipdriver to pick them up ASAP."


This is kind of the mentality we should be getting away from.

The vast majority of US imports come by way of sea. This is a business, and in this business time means money. Mariners do not want to be "put on their toes" to react like it is a real life scenario. Can you imagine how many angry mariners (with powerful lobbies) would be floating around Norfolk if every inbound and outbound Navy ship wanted to include them in all of the "fun"?

I have my own drills to complete. I will not be part of a Navy drill.


For anyone who has been on an extended MOB SAR case, it works a little different from that. We had an 8 hour search for a cruise ship MOB, involving my cutter, another Coast Guard cutter, a Coast Guard helo, and two cruise ships. No one felt annoyed when it was a human being we were looking for. Even the cruise ship passengers were hoping to find the man in the water.

That's the real life scenario. None of the ships trained before. We hadn't been quizing the cruise ship captains on what to do.

It may be hard to understand for some people, but ships out there are manned by professional mariners, they know how to recover a MOB, they gone through training, they don't just dial 911 when there's a fire. I can assure you, there would be no love left for the Navy on the high seas or elsewhere if you regarded mariners engaged in their business to get on their toes, so it feels more real for your crew.

I understand the value of getting a drill as close to real as possible, I understand the importance of shorting bearings and testing your skills in shallow waters, but you will have to remember, other ships out there feel no need to participate, nor should they.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top