Who is dumber?

flieger83 is correct


http://www.sptimes.com/2002/01/06/TampaBay/Plane_hits_skyscraper.shtml

Right after 9/11, this plane flew into the Bank of America building in Tampa. It killed the pilot and broke a window. That is it. My son's college roomate's father was 5 floors above it when it hit. When it happened, they didn't hear it. The building security folks told them. Holland and knight law firm has there office on the top floors.

The folks who evacuated the Wisconsin capitol building because that is their plan. Not matter what size the plane, the plan says evacuate.
 
"I was attempting to be more diplomatic than saying "Wilbur, you don't know what you're talking about"."

Your attempt at 'diplomacy' is laughable. I agree whole heartedly that some information is classified and should not be available to the American public. And I agree that for a terrorist, it is none of their business. But to my safety and well being as an American citizen, it is indeed very much my business. However, I do understand that it is prudent that the general public not have access to it.

To continue to flog a dead horse, how can one claim intelligence decisions based on a deranged individual committed to suicide flying a stolen plane. Anything short of the F-16 pilot visually observing him wearing a clerical collar with the back end full of communion wafers for an Easter morning sunrise service, I would consider him totally unpredictable. Besides, we all know that sometimes our government hides unscrupulously behind the FOUO/classified veil. Again, it worked out great this time and as a concerned taxpayer, I certainly have the right to hope that the entire incident receives a very critical review.
 
Last edited:
So, you want to know, but you don't want anyone else to know. Welcome to the world of the general public. Loose lips.
 
I never said that at all. Read the last part of my post. My single desire is that it receives an appropriate critical review from the top down and that the proper lessons were learned.

I supposed my concerned taxpayer position on all of this is that, assuming you are at work, our government feels the need to pay someone with taxpayer dollars to keep us 'general public' in our place as you seem to have so much time to do.
 
And I would say, you can assume there is a review and an after action report for everything. You can also assume, if the terrorists shouldn't see it, neither would you. Open source information is there for everyone to see.

You seem to want to know everything that happened while saying no one else should know. If you're concerned about the security of the nation, call your Congressman, but everything you've offered up is pure speculation.

What did you NOT like about how this happened? Had they shot down the plane and you found out it was a family of five that didn't know that they were flying in restricted area....what would you have said then?

"I think the tax payers need to be protected from the knee-jerk reactions of a trigger happy DHS and Air Force. Why were't they 100% sure before they shot them out of the sky?"
 
OK well I still think the dog killers were dumber. I heard Marcus Luttrell yesterday and he is still very upset. I hope he does not come in close unsupervised contact with these young men. If I were any of the accused I would probably be begging for protective custody from the NAVY SEAL community and PETA.
 
They Kiled the Dog = Lutterell = should have pullled the trigger in the first instance = didn't = called police on 911 = chased through four counties = should have fired two in each = didn't = they threatened him = Morons. Where is PETA when we need them.
 
PETA offered a $5000 reward for info on the second guy while he was at large. He eventually turned himself in.

I'm with PETA on this one.

Mark that down as 'C' for Curveball... I agree with PETA...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top