Asking for DS. Who In his CoC should he approach to ask about his aptitude grade and how he can raise it next semester.
Ders_dadThanks for the insight.
FWIW, he was ranked 2 of 40 by his company Plebes. He tutors within the company, takes watch-for others during weekends, led the company plebes’ A-N spirit mission (including getting permission thru CoC). After a long discussion tonight it sounds like he and his training officer did not see eye to eye on some things. I don’t want to insert myself in this - it is not my place. But I don’t want him to stew. I want him to seek feedback and to take it to heart. It’s a good lesson on navigating the world ahead of him.
Much better answer then mine. . . .Your DS should take the “chain” of command quite literally; the first link in his chain is most likely his squad leader, the 1/C who has the most direct supervisory role in his life. Since leadership will have switched to the new company leadership, he should go to his old squad leader.
I think what I used to know as the “military performance” grade has been re-named in the last 10 years or so as the “aptitude” grade. There is probably still a cap on the number of grades at each level, to prevent grade inflation. This trains the 1/C in this concept, which is similar to grade breakout in a group on officer performance evals.
The aptitude grade can cover a number of things, especially things observable in company. Here are some rhetorical questions:
Grooming, uniforms and room inspections: does he have to be reminded about hair cuts, uniform appearance, room standards, performance on room inspections
Plebe knowledge (assume he’s a Plebe?): satisfactory quiz and Plebe rate performance
Other stuff: Good attitude? Gets along with roommates? Responds well to corrective counseling? Leans forward to help classmates, is not invisible or focused on himself? If a varsity athlete or heavily involved in other activities, is he spending enough time in company area so upperclass outside his squad and platoon get to know him?
Things he can do:
- completely squared away in uniform, grooming and room
- performs his Plebe duties well, is respected and appreciated by fellow plebes
- learns from mistakes, responds to counseling, doesn’t repeat mistakes
- leans forward to help in the company - is he a calculus whiz, offers to tutor classmates or form a study group in company; volunteers to help with a company event or squad outing; asks for extra assignments to help out an upperclass; if a PT ace, offers to help struggling classmates on remedial PT to pace their run or work on sit-ups. That kind of stuff.
I saw the C grades going to plebes who were muck-ups with uniform/grooming, who had social problems getting along with roommates and not acting to resolve it, who didn’t progress in Plebe duties or knowledge, who were invisible in company, who were all about themselves and not known to help others or be counted on.
There could be any number of reasons. This is for your DS to ask for honest, specific feedback and then figure out how to respond.
It’s one big leadership lab, and figuring a way through these things is part of the lab exercises.
I don’t want to insert myself in this - it is not my place. But I don’t want him to stew. I want him to seek feedback and to take it to heart. It’s a good lesson on navigating the world ahead of him.
There has been shuffling and scrambling on a back and forth/on and off basis for decades. The difference between the two is either all plebes in a company move en masse to the new company versus Each Individual being assigned randomly.Finally, this situation is a good illustration of why some classes get scrambled after Plebe Year. For those new here, there will be thread next Spring about whether the Plebe class is going to get scrambled or shotgunned, which is essentially removing the Plebes from their Plebe year company and moving them to another company. The benefit is to give the Plebe a "fresh start" as a Youngster, without any baggage they picked up as a Plebe.
I’m so curious how things turned out for captmj’s sponsor daughter...did she FIO?
Your DS should take the “chain” of command quite literally; the first link in his chain is most likely his squad leader, the 1/C who has the most direct supervisory role in his life. Since leadership will have switched to the new company leadership, he should go to his old squad leader.
I think what I used to know as the “military performance” grade has been re-named in the last 10 years or so as the “aptitude” grade. There is probably still a cap on the number of grades at each level, to prevent grade inflation. This trains the 1/C in this concept, which is similar to grade breakout in a group on officer performance evals.
The aptitude grade can cover a number of things, especially things observable in company. Here are some rhetorical questions:
Grooming, uniforms and room inspections: does he have to be reminded about hair cuts, uniform appearance, room standards, performance on room inspections
Plebe knowledge (assume he’s a Plebe?): satisfactory quiz and Plebe rate performance
Other stuff: Good attitude? Gets along with roommates? Responds well to corrective counseling? Leans forward to help classmates, is not invisible or focused on himself? If a varsity athlete or heavily involved in other activities, is he spending enough time in company area so upperclass outside his squad and platoon get to know him?
Things he can do:
- completely squared away in uniform, grooming and room
- performs his Plebe duties well, is respected and appreciated by fellow plebes
- learns from mistakes, responds to counseling, doesn’t repeat mistakes
- leans forward to help in the company - is he a calculus whiz, offers to tutor classmates or form a study group in company; volunteers to help with a company event or squad outing; asks for extra assignments to help out an upperclass; if a PT ace, offers to help struggling classmates on remedial PT to pace their run or work on sit-ups. That kind of stuff.
I saw the C grades going to plebes who were muck-ups with uniform/grooming, who had social problems getting along with roommates and not acting to resolve it, who didn’t progress in Plebe duties or knowledge, who were invisible in company, who were all about themselves and not known to help others or be counted on.
There could be any number of reasons. This is for your DS to ask for honest, specific feedback and then figure out how to respond.
It’s one big leadership lab, and figuring a way through these things is part of the lab exercises.
CaptMJ hit most of the great points.
I would also suggest that your DS solicit serious feedback halfway through each semester (“midterm counseling”). I can’t recall if squad leaders still do midterm counseling, but if it isn’t done, seek it out and make sure to talk about strengths and areas to improve - it is a great time to ask what can be done to improve leadership skills (I would try to avoid asking how to get a better grade, but sometimes it is hard to discuss without bringing it up). A good squad leader will take the time and make it a point to help each of their squad members improve (it shouldn’t be something that is quickly brushed over - i.e. “just sign the paper”). Also, don’t forget about the company’s senior enlisted advisor! They can be another valuable input...they have been dealing with officer and enlisted Sailors and Marines in the Fleet/FMF.
And if I recall correctly, counseling is done towards the end of the semester, but it is before rankings and the military (aptitude) grade is assigned. Not a fan of this format because this is not how it is done in the Fleet...hard breakouts (akin to the MIDN aptitude grade quotas) are known during FITREP debriefs and you can ask the reporting senior for their RSCA (lifetime ranking average) to see where one falls.
To close out, always always always ask where you can improve, even when the evaluation/counseling is positive in nature!