West Point Cheating Scandal

Lack of character? Lack of academic qualifications? Or maybe just plain lazy.

I assume it’s a mix of all three. Certainly a lack of character to cheat.

Lack of academic qualifications? Maybe. But even those that are academically qualified might struggle with the 20 credit hours plus military in some subjects.

Lazy would be my first choice.
 
It was a mutiny. A mutiny against Calculus.

Anyone who has what it takes to be appointed to a service academy, has what it takes to get through Calculus if they want to and work hard enough. There are plenty of resources available . Even in college ROTC free tutors are supplied to cadets and Mids in Calculus and physics. So there’s really no excuse for this. I think Devil Doc is right on. It’s a combination of laziness AND a lack of character.
 
I think if nothing else they should be punished for stupidity. In order to cheat they had to log onto the tutoring website using their USMA email address. It was then an easy process for the professor to get with the tutoring company and find out which USMA emails logged in during the exam.
🙄
 
I think if nothing else they should be punished for stupidity. In order to cheat they had to log onto the tutoring website using their USMA email address. It was then an easy process for the professor to get with the tutoring company and find out which USMA emails logged in during the exam.
🙄
Wait...what? They logged into a tutoring website during the exam?
 
I am confused by the Superintendent's comments explaining why he suspended the policy that prevents Honor violators from representing the school publicly.
I am dismayed by the Superintendent's "explanation." His comments do a huge disservice to The Long Grey Line.

To the extent Lt. General Williams claims to "own" the scandal, he should provide much greater illumination of the conduct that occurred and precisely how it has been handled and why, or he could just resign as a way of truly owning the scandal.

Every time the broadcast tomorrow lauds the Football Players' commitment to service and purports to honor them, I will wonder whether we are talking about one of the 17 cheaters (per USA Today) left on the roster for tomorrow's game. I will wonder whether the AD, Mike Buddie, or Coach Monken lobbied for lenient treatment of "Athletes" generally or Football Team members specifically, and whether Lt. General Williams lacked the good judgment to apply all policies concerning Honor Code violations without any exceptions. As I understood reporting, most of the cheaters have admitted to the Honor Code violation. So, I'm not going to pretend that these young men (tomorrow) might be getting an undeserved black eye unless the Academy puts a spokesperson on the broadcast to fully explain the facts. The Cadets who cheated brought dishonor on the entire team. No. They brought dishonor on the entire institution. Unfair certainly.

On second thought, I had better just not watch the game. I'm not really going to enjoy thinking about the cheating anyway. So many Cadets handle adversity with such great character so often that it makes this situation truly unfathomable.
 
I am dismayed by the Superintendent's "explanation." His comments do a huge disservice to The Long Grey Line.

To the extent Lt. General Williams claims to "own" the scandal, he should provide much greater illumination of the conduct that occurred and precisely how it has been handled and why, or he could just resign as a way of truly owning the scandal.

Every time the broadcast tomorrow lauds the Football Players' commitment to service and purports to honor them, I will wonder whether we are talking about one of the 17 cheaters (per USA Today) left on the roster for tomorrow's game. I will wonder whether the AD, Mike Buddie, or Coach Monken lobbied for lenient treatment of "Athletes" generally or Football Team members specifically, and whether Lt. General Williams lacked the good judgment to apply all policies concerning Honor Code violations without any exceptions. As I understood reporting, most of the cheaters have admitted to the Honor Code violation. So, I'm not going to pretend that these young men (tomorrow) might be getting an undeserved black eye unless the Academy puts a spokesperson on the broadcast to fully explain the facts. The Cadets who cheated brought dishonor on the entire team. No. They brought dishonor on the entire institution. Unfair certainly.

On second thought, I had better just not watch the game. I'm not really going to enjoy thinking about the cheating anyway. So many Cadets handle adversity with such great character so often that it makes this situation truly unfathomable.
I wont watch...may be tempted to cheer for wv.
 
I am confused by the Superintendent's comments explaining why he suspended the policy that prevents Honor violators from representing the school publicly.

Disgrace.

Exactly. His explanation makes no sense to me. Whatsoever. :confused2:

Does he mean that punishing the athletes that cheated by taking away games is inequitable because there are non-athletes that cheated that don’t have games taken away?

The superintendent said that he “owns” this incident. He does not.
+1 to all

Embarrassment. Full Stop.
 
Where are people reading about cadets and mids logging into a website? Has that been released by either USMA or USNA? I have not read that anywhere.
 
Letter to Alumni today from Supe with more details:

December 30, 2020

Members of the Long Gray Line,

Last Spring, while in remote learning environments away from the United States Military Academy, 73 Cadets were accused of violating the Cadet Honor Code by cheating on a calculus final. Of these 73 Cadets, 72 are from the class of ’23 and one is from the class of ’22. All but one of these young men and women were in the tenth month of their 47-month leader development journey.

These Cadets chose the easier wrong over the harder right.

As the Superintendent, I own this cheating incident. Furthermore, I and every leader at West Point own their role in developing leaders of character.

The standards established by the Cadet Honor Code have not changed and the Honor System receives my personal investment of time and attention. West Point takes every Honor Code violation seriously.

The incident involves a cross-section of Cadets from the Corps. They represent multiple companies. Some are athletes and some are Preparatory School Graduates. They include Division I Athletes from nine different teams and athletes from three different club squad teams. This incident is not isolated within one club, team, company, or regiment.

The strength, power and uniqueness of the West Point Leader Development Model is that while here on these hallowed grounds, we place our young men and women in the toughest, most demanding academic, military, physical, and character programs that shape, forge, and mold these young men and women into officers over time. The professors, both civilian and military, the staff, the Tactical Officers and Noncommissioned Officers, and our coaches are all mission essential role models that drive how we develop leaders of character.

The global pandemic disrupted our developmental process. In an instant, our tried and tested leadership model was interrupted and for a short time the Corps was dispersed to 4400 locations around the world. In this environment our Cadets were void of those critical developmental engagements in the barracks, in the classrooms, and on the athletic fields that help them understand themselves and increase their commitment to the West Point and Army values. Our plebes are the most vulnerable to the effects of losing the inspiration and accountability of an in person cohesive team.

Even though the environment changed, there is still no excuse for the actions of these Cadets; their actions are antithetical to the same honor code upheld by generations of USMA graduates.

These Cadets were notified of the allegations in May, and not incepted into the Honor System until September because the Corps was away from the Academy grounds. The Class of 2021 Honor Committee returned to West Point in August to receive training and to begin processing other cases already incepted. The Honor Committee is handling every case in compliance with the established sequence that ensures due process for every accused Cadet. Barring unforeseen circumstances, we expect all cases related to this cheating incident to be complete by April 2021.

As many of you know, over time the Honor System has changed from an attritional model to a developmental model. Since the publication of the findings of the Borman Commission in 1976, Superintendents have used discretion regarding separation for an Honor violation.

In the Spring of 2016, the Academy developed the Willful Admission Process (WAP) to encourage Cadets to take responsibility for their actions and reduce the barriers to reporting honor violations. In addition to losing rank and privileges, all Cadets granted discretion are enrolled in the Special Leader Development Program for Honor (SLDP-H). SLDP-H requires completion of a rigorous program of personal reflection and growth that is roughly equivalent to a 2.0 credit course. They do so under the tutelage of an assigned developmental coach who volunteers about 50 hours of coaching. If Cadets do not demonstrate growth in SLDP-H, they will be separated from the Academy.

In January 2020, I directed that we establish the Character Integration and Advisory Group (CIAG). Its purpose is to elevate, develop, and integrate character education across all of our developmental programs. In October 2020, I directed the CIAG and the Superintendent’s Honor Review Committee to conduct a bottom-up review of the cadet honor process and to assess the overall effectiveness of the Cadet Honor Code and the Honor System. The purpose is to ensure the Cadet Honor Code and Honor System are effectively and efficiently achieving the character development goals articulated in West Point’s strategic documents.

Developing leaders of character has been, and remains, my top priority for the Academy. We remain committed to the outcomes of the West Point Leader Development System, which is to graduate commissioned officers who live honorably, lead honorably, and demonstrate excellence.

Our West Point Honor Code has been and will always remain the very core of our institution.

Darryl A. Williams
Lieutenant General, U.S. Army
Superintendent
 
Where are people reading about cadets and mids logging into a website? Has that been released by either USMA or USNA? I have not read that anywhere.
Good point. That’s the CNN and I broke my own rule about not perpetuating CNN. If able I would delete my post.
 
"Lt. Gen. Darryl Williams, the superintendent, in an Oct. 23 memo, wrote to the faculty that the policy "has resulted in an inequitable application of consequences and developmental opportunities for select groups of cadets." USA TODAY obtained a copy of the memo."

It doesn't take a West Point graduate; a Rhodes Scholarship; or a Harvard doctorate to read ---not between the lines, but the EXACT lines of the Supt's statement. There's a reason the honor code is in stone at West Point. Clearly, the stone has transformed to an Etch-a-Sketch (for the younger folks = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch).

The honor code has taken a mortal hit= :stretcher:
 
"Lt. Gen. Darryl Williams, the superintendent, in an Oct. 23 memo, wrote to the faculty that the policy "has resulted in an inequitable application of consequences and developmental opportunities for select groups of cadets." USA TODAY obtained a copy of the memo."

It doesn't take a West Point graduate; a Rhodes Scholarship; or a Harvard doctorate to read ---not between the lines, but the EXACT lines of the Supt's statement. There's a reason the honor code is in stone at West Point. Clearly, the stone has transformed to an Etch-a-Sketch (for the younger folks = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch).

The honor code has taken a mortal hit= :stretcher:
Respectfully Sir,
This entire fiasco has not played out to completion yet. The very nature of internal personnel investigations calls for absolute discretion for the individuals involved. In every case.

It may very well be that we never get to know the intimate details. That is just the way it has to be.
What I do know is that the Supe knows more than anyone in these forums does and is almost certainly not operating based on conjecture.
General Williams may indeed be mis-stepping, then again, he may not be.

We are on the outside looking in....
 
Just wondering, where you read that the MIDN logged onto a tutoring site during the Physics exam. I've only seen the Deans statement which does not say that.

@UHBlackhawk said it best:

Good point. That’s the CNN and I broke my own rule about not perpetuating CNN. If able I would delete my post.

Actually I have to develop my rule better too. But the point is the same.
 
Really!!!??? "Some enlisted kid"? I agree it is not the end of the world for an enlisted kid to be discharged as an 18 year old but it is also not the end of the world for "soon-to-be-world leaders." Second lieutenants do not lead the world and the majority of WP grads, especially the low character ones, will be one and done. Five and dive. They are not "world leaders" even at that point. If they are canned from the academy they can go to regular college or enlist. Then they will be just some enlisted kid who will have plenty of time to think about squandered opportunities.
I agree with your point about calling an enlisted sailor/soldier/airman "some enlisted kid" in a dismissive tone, but I have to say I read the same kind of thing in your comment about an SA grad who fulfills their commitment and leaves the service as "low character." Plenty of SA grads fulfill their commitment and go on to be leaders of large scale companies, government agencies etc. I don't believe that makes them of "low character" maybe I'm reading your comment wrong, if so I apologize.
 
I have unfortunately lost respect for LT Gen Williams and WP in general. If the "Honor Code" specifies a Cadet will neither lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those who do, that implies no leeway. I am getting a little tired of hearing that discipline has been replaced by "course work monitored closely by a "developmental coach"" is a move towards not offending these young people or their parents, NOT developing leaders. Each of these Cadets knew going in that they would be held to a higher standard than college students and yet they seemed to feel that it was OK this once. When we put other soldiers and sailors at risk by having their leaders do things that the soldiers or sailors would get "crucified" over by this same person, there is much irony there.

I truly believe either you have standards or you don't and when "political correctness" takes over for leadership and honesty "Houston we have a problem"! We have sons in different programs, and if either one resorted to cheating, stealing, or lying the school likely would not have to expel them, they would be removed. IMHO there is no position or room for leaders that can't be trusted. I am sorry in advance if I offend anyone, it is not meant as such, only my opinion and memories of service and what it meant to be respected, honest, and forthright!
 
Back
Top