UHBlackhawk
5-Year Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2015
- Messages
- 2,342
I’m confused. What did General Williams specifically do that was contrary to the current honor code? The USA Today article is rather vague and does not show the specific memo in its entirety. Don’t get me wrong. There may be issues. But as with most USA Today articles it’s weak on substance. I would prefer to see more information before making judgements.I have unfortunately lost respect for LT Gen Williams and WP in general. If the "Honor Code" specifies a Cadet will neither lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those who do, that implies no leeway. I am getting a little tired of hearing that discipline has been replaced by "course work monitored closely by a "developmental coach"" is a move towards not offending these young people or their parents, NOT developing leaders. Each of these Cadets knew going in that they would be held to a higher standard than college students and yet they seemed to feel that it was OK this once. When we put other soldiers and sailors at risk by having their leaders do things that the soldiers or sailors would get "crucified" over by this same person, there is much irony there.
I truly believe either you have standards or you don't and when "political correctness" takes over for leadership and honesty "Houston we have a problem"! We have sons in different programs, and if either one resorted to cheating, stealing, or lying the school likely would not have to expel them, they would be removed. IMHO there is no position or room for leaders that can't be trusted. I am sorry in advance if I offend anyone, it is not meant as such, only my opinion and memories of service and what it meant to be respected, honest, and forthright!