- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,059
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/03/army-camo-4-replacement-options-weighed-031012w/
The beauty of the Army is that it changes things so frequently that you can pretty much recycle the headlines about every ten years as the old and obsolete becomes new and cutting edge- whether it's organization or equipment.. what I want to know is Why there weren't some reliefs for cause over the ACU? It was apparent right from the beginning that the ACU was truly a dog, and apparently the testing they did at Natick before rolling these things out demonstrated that - yet they still went ahead fielding a uniform that basically provided excellent camouflage in a granite quarry but no where else.
The beauty of the Army is that it changes things so frequently that you can pretty much recycle the headlines about every ten years as the old and obsolete becomes new and cutting edge- whether it's organization or equipment.. what I want to know is Why there weren't some reliefs for cause over the ACU? It was apparent right from the beginning that the ACU was truly a dog, and apparently the testing they did at Natick before rolling these things out demonstrated that - yet they still went ahead fielding a uniform that basically provided excellent camouflage in a granite quarry but no where else.