Good morning, clarkson! You're probably right, but I think we may ultimately see a twist to CC's original plan. I'm probably going to be flamed for this, but if I were CC, I would delay announcement of the Jan. results and wait to see (1) how many scholarships they'll have for this year, and (2) how the packets submitted to the March 8 board shape up. Then, once CC knows how many scholarships they can offer, the two boards could hold an unplanned joint meeting to coordinate and then issue a joint announcement and take the top folks from both boards. I say this because I think it wouldn't be fair at this point to hand out all the scholarships to those who were board-ready by December 27, when the stated deadline for applying was 10 January. Of course, this puts the scholarship announcements from the Jan. board at around the third or fourth week of March or so.
I suppose we'll know whether this might be a likely scenario if word leaks out that the members of the Jan. 4 board are making unscheduled plane reservations for Louisville, Ky in the coming weeks.
I know there is a certain appeal to the statement "Hey, I had my packet ready way early! Why should I suffer because others didn't?" However, if CC had made it clear that awardees would be selected on a "first come, first served" basis so "get your packets in early, it's to your benefit", I would agree. But they didn't. Expectations of the applicants has to be honored in my judgment.
Totally agree with the "epic" nature of this thread. Your post probably added another 1000 views in just 15 minutes (your thoughts are highly, highly valued here).