Navy to begin separation process

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently, I can drive to my Total Wine store and get this curbside right now. I am not sure if it will compare to one made in front of me with a fresh lime wedge, but I must say Gosling’s doesn’t miss a bet.

And I do apologize to the folks here who continue with the original vein of conversation. I mean no disrespect. I had to retire to The Sidebar and think about other things with some like-minded souls, and could not bestir myself to drop into the Cocktail thread.

View attachment 10796
Have had this - not a fan. DIY much better.
 
I plan on experimenting with Barritt’s and Gosling’s ginger beer tonight. I have a lot of good memories attached to the Gosling’s variety so I expect I will be biased.
I'm "eh" on Gosling's ginger beer. I think it's a vertical integration/marketing thing for them. My favorites are:

Barritt's
Reed's
Regatta
Fever Tree
 
Not to cast aspersions on ginger beer (I drank it's relative Irn-Bru for a while when I could get it) but while looking at an article today I answered my own question from earlier in this thread regarding all this emphasis on force readiness and strict compliance under threat of the boot for what exactly? What are the numbers? Well here is an unfortunate situation for someone in CA. This person passed away with covid just a few days ago. Can't get a much worse result than that. What surprised me though are the numbers. I have the impression that thousands of sailors have passed away from covid. Drastic measures need to be taken.

The article makes it clear my impression was wrong. This unfortunate soul - Lt. Ivey Quintana-Martinez was the 17th person to die with covid in the Navy.

From the article:
Navy data released days before her death showed only one sailor hospitalized with COVID-related illness out of some 661 cases.

Quintana-Martinez’s death brings to 17 the number of fatalities among sailors from COVID-related causes.


17 is 17 too many. But are those numbers what you think of when you hear the urgency? Those numbers include the unvaccinated that are being separated. Someone said the suicide number is higher. I don't know but will look it up.

All the statements on this board about how selfish these people are for not getting vaccinated, how they don't care about others, how they are destroying force readiness, how they can't be trusted in command of others - I don't see support for those statements with these numbers.

What I see is the 99%+ survival rate (for vaccinated and unvaccinated) and a much smaller group at much higher risk. Doesn't it make sense to focus on the high risk group rather than purge so many people?
 
Not to cast aspersions on ginger beer (I drank it's relative Irn-Bru for a while when I could get it) but while looking at an article today I answered my own question from earlier in this thread regarding all this emphasis on force readiness and strict compliance under threat of the boot for what exactly? What are the numbers? Well here is an unfortunate situation for someone in CA. This person passed away with covid just a few days ago. Can't get a much worse result than that. What surprised me though are the numbers. I have the impression that thousands of sailors have passed away from covid. Drastic measures need to be taken.

The article makes it clear my impression was wrong. This unfortunate soul - Lt. Ivey Quintana-Martinez was the 17th person to die with covid in the Navy.

From the article:
Navy data released days before her death showed only one sailor hospitalized with COVID-related illness out of some 661 cases.

Quintana-Martinez’s death brings to 17 the number of fatalities among sailors from COVID-related causes.


17 is 17 too many. But are those numbers what you think of when you hear the urgency? Those numbers include the unvaccinated that are being separated. Someone said the suicide number is higher. I don't know but will look it up.

All the statements on this board about how selfish these people are for not getting vaccinated, how they don't care about others, how they are destroying force readiness, how they can't be trusted in command of others - I don't see support for those statements with these numbers.

What I see is the 99%+ survival rate (for vaccinated and unvaccinated) and a much smaller group at much higher risk. Doesn't it make sense to focus on the high risk group rather than purge so many people?
Wait until the truth comes out.

A Navy Surgeon has come out and stated that there have been 20 covid deaths in military from Covid. There have been more from complications from the vaccines.

 
Not to cast aspersions on ginger beer (I drank it's relative Irn-Bru for a while when I could get it) but while looking at an article today I answered my own question from earlier in this thread regarding all this emphasis on force readiness and strict compliance under threat of the boot for what exactly? What are the numbers? Well here is an unfortunate situation for someone in CA. This person passed away with covid just a few days ago. Can't get a much worse result than that. What surprised me though are the numbers. I have the impression that thousands of sailors have passed away from covid. Drastic measures need to be taken.

The article makes it clear my impression was wrong. This unfortunate soul - Lt. Ivey Quintana-Martinez was the 17th person to die with covid in the Navy.

From the article:
Navy data released days before her death showed only one sailor hospitalized with COVID-related illness out of some 661 cases.

Quintana-Martinez’s death brings to 17 the number of fatalities among sailors from COVID-related causes.


17 is 17 too many. But are those numbers what you think of when you hear the urgency? Those numbers include the unvaccinated that are being separated. Someone said the suicide number is higher. I don't know but will look it up.

All the statements on this board about how selfish these people are for not getting vaccinated, how they don't care about others, how they are destroying force readiness, how they can't be trusted in command of others - I don't see support for those statements with these numbers.

What I see is the 99%+ survival rate (for vaccinated and unvaccinated) and a much smaller group at much higher risk. Doesn't it make sense to focus on the high risk group rather than purge so many people?


Wait until the truth comes out.

A Navy Surgeon has come out and stated that there have been 20 covid deaths in military from Covid. There have been more from complications from the vaccines.


Uhhhhh.....the "truth" is out. Confirmed today, the 3rd leading cause of death in 2020 was from Covid:



This is on top of the fact that the number of Covid deaths are likely to be vastly underreported:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanam/article/PIIS2667-193X(21)00011-9/fulltext# (Lancet study)






Watching an uncredited "TikTok" video with an unnamed "Navy surgeon"? Really?

How about an actual, verified video from the SURGEON GENERAL of the Navy?



The amount of conspiratorial misinformation being thrown around is amazing.
 
Isn't Stars & Stripes a military publication? Not sure why you consider that misinformation. I do note what you said earlier "If you consider that a worldwide pandemic that has crippled education, the economy, the healthcare system, social structures and damaged the mental health of perhaps a billion people on the planet to be "blown out of proportion for what it is" then I would have to say I agree with your father."

When I read that my first thought wasn't that the pandemic did that but rather the response to the pandemic did that. I just took a glance at the first article you linked (will get to the others in time) and it supports that thought.

From your article: Death rates increased by almost 43 percent for Hispanic males and more than 32 percent for Hispanic females. Death rates in Black males rose by 28 percent and almost 25 percent for Black females, compared to roughly 13 percent for white males and 12 percent for white females. “That just shouldn’t be happening,” Woolf said. “There is this deeply embedded health consequence of systemic racism.”

This is a response issue.

From the article: Nine of the 10 long-time leading causes of death in the U.S. stayed the same, with Covid appearing on the list for the first time. Deaths from heart disease remained the leading cause of death, with cancer second, followed by Covid-19, unintentional injuries — which includes drug overdoses — stroke, chronic lower respiratory disease, Alzheimer’s disease, influenza and pneumonia, and kidney disease. Deaths due to heart disease, unintentional injury and diabetes saw the biggest rises.

There are still many ways to die in the time of covid.

From the article:
The rise in deaths from these other causes show the impact the pandemic has had on all aspects of health in America, experts say.

“What these increases in non-Covid causes are telling us is that in addition to people dying of Covid directly, there was also an adverse effect on people’s health for conditions unrelated to the virus,” Woolf said. Decreased access to care and medication, as well as the stress of the pandemic itself, contributed to the rise in non-Covid deaths, he said.

Again this is a response issue.

Article: Death from diabetes rose sixteenfold from 2019 to 2020, and surpassed 100,000 deaths for the first time, the report found.

What your first article tells me is that the way the pandemic was handled led to a lot of extra deaths. The one size fits all approach of lockdowns and vaccinations (to the exclusion of any other therapeutics, including your favorite whipping boy Ivermectin) combined with the incessant fear mongering no doubt had a role in the unavailability of medical care or the reluctance to use medical care that contributed to the increase in the death rate.

Just curious as we can tell you are passionate about this issue. What do you think the credibility is of the "your all gonna die this Christmas if you don't get vaccinated" and similar dire predictions that don't pan out as advertised. When you say for nearly two years in a row that death is immanent for everyone with the worst plague in modern history and there are 17 dead sailors with covid out of how many? 450,000? What is that? .003%? You are willing to run the inquisition for an ailment that has a 99.997 survival rate with current Navy sailors?

Sorry, I think something else is going on here. I appreciate how serious you consider the situation but the numbers don't add up.
 
The Admiral Gillingham video is interesting. I wonder when it was made as it doesn't square up with the current situation but it does lay out the plan.

1 - Clear path to Victory - 3 safe and effective vaccines in our arsenal.
2 - These vaccines are safe. Pfizer, Moderna, and Jansen vaccines all meet FDA's high standards. Benefits of being vaccinated far outweigh the risks of the vaccines. Zero hospitalizations or severe infections of those fully immunized. More than 100 severe infections of those not vaccinated. 94% protection for fully immunized.
3 - Fully vaccinated is path back to normalcy - CDC guidance fully vaccinated don't need to wear masks indoors or outdoors. Force readiness, do your part, we are here to help you.

Yeah, that is a good summation of the official position pre-mandate.

Are the vaccines safe and effective (Clear Path to Victory)? For some but not all they are safe. As of today CDC VAERS shows 10,483 deaths from the covid vaccines in the US. You don't want to be in that 10,483. 94% effective? Hardly. For the 1000 kids at Cornell they were not effective at preventing them from catching or spreading covid. J&J no longer meets those FDA high standards. None of these vaccines are the FDA approved version (Comirnaty) that every service member is actually supposed to get. Not a single one. Not that it matters for the effect but that is what the law says. It is still unavailable in the US.
Fully vaccinated is path back to normalcy? Again, hardly. Not in California anyway.

I think the best part of the video is the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated results but I would want to know what they mean by severe infection.

So yeah, good video for the time it came out but as I mentioned before you can't keep telling people these things when they see the true results. People stop listening when you lose credibility. That's why it is a mandate and not a request now.
 
Some opinion, some epidemiology numbers - but all great reads to help guide those that have now worn out their Scully and Mulder Halloween costumes, as well as their Betamax copy of "Capricorn One" after the 11,567th viewing:






Here also is one more tidbit (movie trailer) that will help you by way of allegory. Be sure to watch the full movie until the end:



Hope you all have a far more enlightened, conspiracy-free and healthy Christmas and 2022.
 
Great point about the LDS folks. As we all know, many liberals in the made-up, left-wing media also often quote Reagan as well.
 
To all my fellow tipplers out there, I enjoy reading about your recipes, your favorite brands, high balls and cocktails and the stories that go along with them. For instance, "I was drinking Singapore Slings when I had a memorable barfight in Mandalay." That kind of thing. I happen to have a soft spot for Stolichnaya Vodka, which was the only Russian Vodka available back in the day when I was in college studying Russian. The legal age was 18 at the time.

The cheap Scottish Presbyterian in me would make a suggestion to not use high priced liquor in many of the those drinks. Aromatic mixers, which is about all of them, hide the distinctive quality you enjoy in your favorite brand. For instance, tonic kills whatever distinction there is between Bombay Sapphire and Seagrams. The same can be said for Manhattans--an aromatic vermouth will have the same effect between Jim Beam and Woodford Reserve.

I have a good friend, much wealthier than I, who only drinks Macallan single malt. He has bottles of every age and size available. The only way he drinks it or allows it to be drunk in his home is in a small glass with one small ice cube--about a two tablespoon of water.

To tipplers and non-Tipplers alike, I wish you all a Merry Christmas! If you don't celebrate know that you would be welcome in homes, like mine, that do celebrate
 
To all my fellow tipplers out there, I enjoy reading about your recipes, your favorite brands, high balls and cocktails and the stories that go along with them. For instance, "I was drinking Singapore Slings when I had a memorable barfight in Mandalay." That kind of thing. I happen to have a soft spot for Stolichnaya Vodka, which was the only Russian Vodka available back in the day when I was in college studying Russian. The legal age was 18 at the time.

The cheap Scottish Presbyterian in me would make a suggestion to not use high priced liquor in many of the those drinks. Aromatic mixers, which is about all of them, hide the distinctive quality you enjoy in your favorite brand. For instance, tonic kills whatever distinction there is between Bombay Sapphire and Seagrams. The same can be said for Manhattans--an aromatic vermouth will have the same effect between Jim Beam and Woodford Reserve.

I have a good friend, much wealthier than I, who only drinks Macallan single malt. He has bottles of every age and size available. The only way he drinks it or allows it to be drunk in his home is in a small glass with one small ice cube--about a two tablespoon of water.

To tipplers and non-Tipplers alike, I wish you all a Merry Christmas! If you don't celebrate know that you would be welcome in homes, like mine, that do celebrate
Here's lookin' at you kid. Merry Christmas.
 
To all my fellow tipplers out there, I enjoy reading about your recipes, your favorite brands, high balls and cocktails and the stories that go along with them. For instance, "I was drinking Singapore Slings when I had a memorable barfight in Mandalay." That kind of thing. I happen to have a soft spot for Stolichnaya Vodka, which was the only Russian Vodka available back in the day when I was in college studying Russian. The legal age was 18 at the time.

The cheap Scottish Presbyterian in me would make a suggestion to not use high priced liquor in many of the those drinks. Aromatic mixers, which is about all of them, hide the distinctive quality you enjoy in your favorite brand. For instance, tonic kills whatever distinction there is between Bombay Sapphire and Seagrams. The same can be said for Manhattans--an aromatic vermouth will have the same effect between Jim Beam and Woodford Reserve.

I have a good friend, much wealthier than I, who only drinks Macallan single malt. He has bottles of every age and size available. The only way he drinks it or allows it to be drunk in his home is in a small glass with one small ice cube--about a two tablespoon of water.

To tipplers and non-Tipplers alike, I wish you all a Merry Christmas! If you don't celebrate know that you would be welcome in homes, like mine, that do celebrate
- Best value/“go-to”: Woodford
- Best flavor: Blanton’s
- Second best flavor: Michter’s Single Barrel
- Just out of my reach: 23yr pappy
- Just within my reach (NYC last week) but out of my price range: 12yr pappy
 

Attachments

  • E03F07C5-80C3-40C0-8FE4-61F4B07BF407.jpeg
    E03F07C5-80C3-40C0-8FE4-61F4B07BF407.jpeg
    831.8 KB · Views: 7
I grew up drinking Boston Coolers made with Vernor’s ginger ale (the best and only). Imagine my disappointment when we moved to Boston and I ordered one only to get quizzical looks. I didn’t realize that the name referred to a street in Detroit not the city. These are even more fantastic with a splash of your favorite bourbon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top