Sigh.
Where to start with the corrections?
The "Commandant of Cadets" is a US Coast Guard CAPTAIN, therefore, when he holds a mast hearing, it IS a CAPTAIN's MAST. They do not use the term "Article 15" in the US Coast guard, it has no relevance here at all, whatsoever. The U.S. Navy and the U.S. Coast Guard call nonjudicial punishment a captain's mast (or admiral's mast) depending of the rank of the commanding officer.
The matter was fully investigated by CGIS (Coast Guard Investigative Services). They do not have a branch office at the USCGA. And NJP or Captain's Masts do not traditionally go anywhere outside of the command, wherever they take place, academy or not. Historically (from over 200 years ago) a mast hearing never left the ship, where they traditionally took place.
Yes, they are lucky. If you feel they were railroaded, by all means get a law degree and sign up to represent them. Everyone accused at a NJP in the USCG has the right to be represented as well as the right to request a court martial if they wish.
I'm sure it was, as it was in the best interests of the cadets as well. If you feel denied your pound of flesh, file a complaint. Just as it was in the best interests of West Point to dismiss/disenroll cadets there for certain offenses rather than hold a formal court martial, I'm sure the Commandant used his best judgement. If you disagree, you can call him at (860) 444-8280, his name is CAPT John Fitzgerald
Sigh. They have not completed two years, these cadets are from the Class of 2012, which just began their 3/c year yesterday. They officially became 3/c cadets back in late May when the Class of 2009 graduated. They wouldn't have owed the academy anything even if they quit on their own, as it is at every Service Academy. No obligation begins until your 2/c year.
Re-read the article, it contains lots of valuable information.