Thoughts on this year's Branching

Discussion in 'ROTC' started by Jcleppe, Nov 20, 2014.

  1. Jcleppe

    Jcleppe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    842
    Having two sons go through ROTC I have followed with interest the branching process over the last seven years. There have been many changes over the year, some good and some bumps in the road.

    I have to say, from reading this board and another, this year seems to have had the highest level of branch satisfaction compared to previous years.

    My older son branched under the old system which included the dreaded "Dead Zone" For those not familiar they would fill 50% of the branch from the top of the OML, then fill the remaining from the bottom 50% mark of the OML down. This left a large Dead Zone for the more popular branches, if a cadet fell into that Dead Zone they had no chance at all of getting that branch.

    Cadets knew before they submitted their packet where they were on the OML. These cadets would then use previous year models to determine if they would fall into that Dead Zone and then would choose their branches accordingly, some called this "Gaming the System".

    With the new system they have gotten rid of that Dead Zone and do not release the OML so cadets do not know where they are on the list, no Gaming the System so to speak.

    They now select the first 45% from the top, then the next 10% from the ADSO's. The remaining slots are given out based on a branching model. The system was designed so cadets would now put on their list the branches they actually want, not what they think they will get. A cadet that would have been in the Dead Zone a few years ago now has a chance to still get one of the more competitive branches, and it seems to have worked that way this year.

    Last year was the first year of this new system, and it seems from watching the results last year that they were still working out the bugs. This year they seemed to have got it right. With 65% on the AD list getting their first choice and 94% getting one of their top three choices, the new system seems to have achieved what it had intended. The satisfaction among cadets seems a lot higher this year.

    I really think CC should be commended for how they handled branching this year, I hope this trend continues.

    Next year could be a little stressful with all the new changes to how the OML is put together. The new training, standardized testing, and changes in how things are calculated may take at least a year to work out the kinks, but at least they seemed to have a good system in place when it comes to actual branching.

    I have to admit, I am not sure my son or others would have received the branches they did under the old system. It was nice to see so many happy with the results this year. Of course not everyone received the news they wanted, that is to be expected in such a large community like AROTC. I would just like to say that I have great admiration for every cadet, whether they are AD or reserve, no matter what branch they have, your service to your country is an amazing thing and I thank you.
     
  2. sheriff3

    sheriff3 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2013
    Messages:
    1,001
    Likes Received:
    319
    +1
     
  3. hokiesfan

    hokiesfan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    8
    Are there any restrictions on how cadets make up their branch list? For example, if you have Branch A on your list you can't have Branch B, you must have Branch F as one of your top five choices, etc. Or are they free to put the branches they want in any order they choose?

    I'm more familiar with the NROTC process and I'm curious how the AROTC process compares.
     
  4. Jcleppe

    Jcleppe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    842
    The requirement used to be that you needed to have at least one "Combat Arms" in your top 3, I know, they don't call it that any more, see the last few threads of the Branching thread to see how they list the branches now. These branches now fall under "Operations" so it could be any one of them would meet the requirement.

    Other then that, they can list the branches as they see fit.

    To be honest I am not sure which of these they require now, sorry, someone should know.

    I never asked my son because he listed all three of the Maneuvers Branches as his top 3
     
  5. Ohio2015Parent

    Ohio2015Parent Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,122
    Likes Received:
    58
    DS hasn't not shared the official stats from his school yet. However, he feels that all 28 cadets were pleased with their branching results. No one he knew of was forced reserve, although a few did request it. Their ROO was already commenting on how much easier this upcoming recruiting season was going to be after this years branching. Last year several cadets were very displeased with their branching results so it is encouraging that for once class of 2015 didn't get the short end of the stick.

    Well, next up the paper work DS began to explain to me that is due 12/5'ish for him. The "wish list"....now it gets a little more real:eek:
     
  6. cfogle311

    cfogle311 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2014
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    As a current ms4, pretty much all of us in our program got one of our top choices. I honestly thought getting rid of the "gaming the system" mentality and adding no certainty to results was going to muddle things ups. After the dust settled though, it did honestly motivate everyone to give it everything they got and to put the effort in developing themselves. CC actually did do a good thing to change this system and I hope theupcoming new changes have the same beneficial results for the rising ms2s and and ms1s.
     

Share This Page