AFROTC help

plus they have very restrictive speech policies.
That seems to be an unusual and bizarre trend these days. Hopefully one that goes out of vogue after a few years.
FYI, Clemson is pretty bad on speech according to FIRE, if that is a major consideration.

FIRE's metrics are used in the more comprehensive "Guide to Colleges" from Heterodox Academy, which considers not only the speech codes that draw Fire's ire but also a libertarian institute's rating and a score based on recent positive (pro-free speech) or negative (stifling of free speech) events. Of the latter, the Heterodox Academy folks say:
"Events on campus that indicate a commitment by faculty, administration and/or students to protect free inquiry and viewpoint diversity are labeled GREEN (+.25 each). If events indicate a restriction or punishment of dissenting opinions or speakers, they are labeled RED (-.25 each). We break out events by their source (students, faculty or administration) and ignore events that involve just a few students or professors, choosing instead to focus on events indicating broader sentiment, norms, or policy. Again, we’re always trying to look at it from the perspective of an incoming first-year student.

The relevant event scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 1.

Example: The support of a college paper by the President of Wesleyan University in light of calls for censorship and vandalism after an objectionable op-ed. (Raised score by 3 points, crediting Administration)

Example: Students shut down a panel event at Rutgers discussing free speech. (Lowered score by 3 points, penalizing Students)

Here is the Heterodox Academy Guide to Colleges' 0-100 scoring of the top 150 colleges/universities' "degree to which each school is likely to be a place that welcomes diverse viewpoints and open discussion about politics and politically charged social issues."

https://heterodoxacademy.org/guide-to-colleges/

The Heterodox folks fo on to say:

In developing the scoring method and weights, we tried to put ourselves in the place of a high school senior who is applying to colleges and who wants to avoid the “walking on eggshells” culture of fear that many students are now reporting. Where should a curious, open-minded student apply? Which schools should she avoid?
 
For NYmom's - and other families', and my own family's - purposes, here are 0-100 scores (100 is excellent, open-minded, "heterodox" schools, 0 is Re-Education Camp closed-mindedness) for several top colleges and universities that have robust ROTC programs:

The Good:

Score of 90+ no colleges with strong ROTC units. Only U CHICAGO got a score > 95 from Heterodox Academy. Sad: U Chicago does not host ROTC.

Score of 80-89: UNC-Chapel Hill, U Florida, Purdue, George Mason U., U Tennessee, UVA, William & Mary

Score 0f 70-79: Carnegie Mellon, U. Mississippi, UMD-College Park, U. Utah

Score 0f 60-69: Arizona State, Wash. U St Louis, Catholic U, Michigan Tech, Oregon State, Villanova, Princeton, Michigan State


The OK / Can't Judge:


Score 0f 50-59: TAMU, U Penn, U Kentucky, Emory, MIT, U. Georgia, Florida State, NC State, U New Hampshire, U Conn., U Nebraska, U. Wisconsin

...


And now, the Bad and the Ugly:

Score below 35 (= need to "walk on eggshells" / culture of fear):

Score 0f 30-35: UC-Irvine, UC-Santa Cruz, DePaul U. - Chicago, Georgetown, RPI, GWU, UC-Davis, Brown U., Penn State, U- Missouri, Drexel U., U Southern California, Indiana U, St Louis U, U Alabama - Tuscaloosa, UC-San Diego, U Vermont

Score 0f 25-29: Rice Notre Dame (!) UT-Austin Harvard


Score of <25 (= maybe you should have a heart-to-heart conversation with your son/daughter about the realities of speech ie these colleges will put you at severe risk if you are out of line with the "orthodoxy"):

Cornell Fordham Georgia Tech Yale UC-Riverside UCLA UC-Berkeley Rutgers NYU Northwestern U. Oregon



 
Michigan, Baylor, Columbia, Ohio State, U. Kansas, Boston College, Virginia Tech, Syracuse, Dartmouth, Case Western, Johns Hopkins all fall into a gray area in the middle rankings (score between 40 and 50 on the 0-100 scale): not terribly restrictive but not very favorable, either, toward "heterodox" opinions & speech.
 
Very interesting resource. Thanks.

It would be nice if folks could just find a place to pay money to get an education without all the "extra". That is one of the nice things about the on-base colleges-- streamlined progression, tailored for the working adult, and no canceled classes due to protests...
 
FIRE's metrics are used in the more comprehensive "Guide to Colleges" from Heterodox Academy, which considers not only the speech codes that draw Fire's ire but also a libertarian institute's rating and a score based on recent positive (pro-free speech) or negative (stifling of free speech) events.

Thanks for listing this. We have used Heterodox Academy, FIRE, and also the ISI book "Choosing the Right College" for information. It is an area that my son believes to be very important. There are schools he is considering that are weak in this area, so that is something he'll have to take into consideration when all the acceptances are in.
Thank you for adding the AFROTC highlights. Very helpful.
 
Back
Top