- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 9,295
Ah, finally, Indexer mixes same race in there...."only angry white people".....
If you look at the voter demographic, it was those "old angry white people" who crossed the "racial lines" and voted not on skin color, but for the person. Race matters to the Democrats, which is why they constantly bring it up.
I think what goes WELL OVER Indexers head is the objections to policy that most Republicans have....using tax payer money to assist organizations that promote abortion, increased tax payer support for organizations involved in voters fraud liks acorn, the nationalization of banks and car companies, the cutting of defense spending despite increased tensions with Russia, Iran, China and North Korea, the closing of GTMO despite bipartisan discomfort with a lack of a plan, the nationalization of healthcare, increased spendng, the possibility of increased taxes to "offset" the reckless spending, weak foreign policy, etc. All of that could have easily been done by a white person as a black person.
It has nothing to do with race, it's policy, and every time liberals bring up race as an excuse....it diminishes what his presidency means. At some point you're going to have to just see an American President, and not a "black man", sitting in that President's chair.
If you look at the voter demographic, it was those "old angry white people" who crossed the "racial lines" and voted not on skin color, but for the person. Race matters to the Democrats, which is why they constantly bring it up.
I think what goes WELL OVER Indexers head is the objections to policy that most Republicans have....using tax payer money to assist organizations that promote abortion, increased tax payer support for organizations involved in voters fraud liks acorn, the nationalization of banks and car companies, the cutting of defense spending despite increased tensions with Russia, Iran, China and North Korea, the closing of GTMO despite bipartisan discomfort with a lack of a plan, the nationalization of healthcare, increased spendng, the possibility of increased taxes to "offset" the reckless spending, weak foreign policy, etc. All of that could have easily been done by a white person as a black person.
It has nothing to do with race, it's policy, and every time liberals bring up race as an excuse....it diminishes what his presidency means. At some point you're going to have to just see an American President, and not a "black man", sitting in that President's chair.