1. North Texas U.S. Service Academies Forum - Mansfield, TX - 29 April 2017 - More Information . Click the "x" to dismiss notice.
    Dismiss Notice

More details on the proposed upcoming resizing of the Army...

Discussion in 'Academy/Military News' started by goaliedad, Jan 25, 2012.

  1. goaliedad

    goaliedad Parent 5-Year Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    36
    Interesting that they see the cuts coming more from enlisted because of officer retention problems...

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-01-25-15-50-39
     
  2. cisco

    cisco 5-Year Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are they cutting combat brigades or just putting them together to make them smaller? :confused:
     
  3. goaliedad

    goaliedad Parent 5-Year Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    36
    My take is both.

    Fewer brigades means less overhead (administrative, support) that is allocated on a per brigade ratio.

    Larger brigades may be more self-sufficient not requiring extra outside support when stretched on missions.

    About 10-12% fewer troops when all is said and done.

    Sounds like turnover is higher in the officer ranks than enlisted with attrition taking care of reductions in the mid-level officer ranks (which currently need incentives I guess) and more careful screening for re-enlistment taking care of enlisted numbers. I'm guessing it will be a bit cut-throat in the flag officer department...
     
  4. MemberLG

    MemberLG 5-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    453
    What I heard was cutting combat brigades and remaining combat brigades gets another maneuver battalion.
     
  5. patentesq

    patentesq Parent 5-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    1,587
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. bruno

    bruno 5-Year Member Retired Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,017
    Likes Received:
    342
    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/...a-says-smaller-military-cutting-edge-012612w/

     
  7. bruno

    bruno 5-Year Member Retired Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,017
    Likes Received:
    342
    Affecting everybody: Big cuts coming; lower pay raises start in 2015
    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/...oming-lower-pay-raises-start-in-2015-012612w/

    Although that sounds bad- I think the reality is that Military pay is at least comparable to civilian pay now for equivalent positions. Gotta do something- I would really like to see them target pay to mid grade NCO's as I think that's where the greatest disparity remains and the demographic most critical to the effectiveness of the force.
     
  8. bruno

    bruno 5-Year Member Retired Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,017
    Likes Received:
    342
    You could have predicted this one with a virtually 100% degree of certainty:

    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/01/airforce-5-a10-squadrons-cut-013012/

    For the Air Force to love an aircraft - it has to go Real Fast, be Real Cool looking, and have a Real Cool nickname to go on that velcro patch (and be real expensive). Actual utility is less of a consideration.
     

Share This Page