Daretodream
5-Year Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
- Messages
- 246
You many recall during BCT last year I shared that my DS had a medical condition uncovered and a diagnosis by exclusion was given to a condition with no known real effects. The diagnosis occurred during BCT and he was ultimately referred to a specialist at a local base.
After testing revealed no defects they stuck to the diagnosis and said in order for him to qualify to be a pilot he needed to show the condition could be controlled by medication. This frustrated my DS since there were no dangers to his health from the diagnosis. However, his dream is to fly so he went on the medication.
Then comes spring and he is all set to Soar and gets told the side effects of the medication in flight is unknown so he is grounded due to being on the medication. He was unhappy but looked more to the long term and decided to make the best of it and concentrated on unmanned flight this summer. He also tested off the charts on the Officer test for pilot.
This week he gets told that his condition will most likely keep him from qualifying from being a pilot due the wording of the regulation and his diagnosis being placed in a grouping of more serious conditions. The regulations have not kept up with technology so it is also applied to unmanned flight which in his mind limits him to desk jobs. He was pretty upset.
I looked at the diagnosis, timing of it during BCT and normal symptoms and he really has none of them. I need some help to advise him on requesting second opinions, and the timing and how to appeal these types of decisions. Thanks
After testing revealed no defects they stuck to the diagnosis and said in order for him to qualify to be a pilot he needed to show the condition could be controlled by medication. This frustrated my DS since there were no dangers to his health from the diagnosis. However, his dream is to fly so he went on the medication.
Then comes spring and he is all set to Soar and gets told the side effects of the medication in flight is unknown so he is grounded due to being on the medication. He was unhappy but looked more to the long term and decided to make the best of it and concentrated on unmanned flight this summer. He also tested off the charts on the Officer test for pilot.
This week he gets told that his condition will most likely keep him from qualifying from being a pilot due the wording of the regulation and his diagnosis being placed in a grouping of more serious conditions. The regulations have not kept up with technology so it is also applied to unmanned flight which in his mind limits him to desk jobs. He was pretty upset.
I looked at the diagnosis, timing of it during BCT and normal symptoms and he really has none of them. I need some help to advise him on requesting second opinions, and the timing and how to appeal these types of decisions. Thanks