sapperboston
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2017
- Messages
- 5
Midwest Dad hit the nail on the head "Consider the long long term future regardless of your military ambitions".
I would have to agree with the notion that attending west point is best if you wish to pursue the highest ranks in the Army. If I'm not mistaken, the vast majority of past chiefs of staff have been USMA grads and isn't there like some kind of old boy system once you reach COL or BG? Unless I am mistaken.
The best advice though is to make the most of this year irregardless of your choice at the end.
Choose USMA If you want to be a career officer. The West Point pedigree really matters.
Like it or not there is an extremely high probability that most 2nd LTs won't serve more than 15-20 years max - its 'up or out' when promotions to LtCol and above are considered and there are limited slots available. Unless you can earn stars you will likely be ~37-42 years old [that's young by the way] and have another 20+ year career prospect ahead of you. SA degree plus top tier grad school on top of officer experience is a dynamite resume. Consider the long long term future regardless of your military ambitions.
After that when you get into the world of politics, I have to imagine that coming from a SA and possibly being part of an old boys networks is going to give you a leg up
You make a good point, and I am not trying to say one should choose SA over ROTC , but I have to believe that going to SA can be very beneficial in the long run. Not going as you have proven, doesnt mean you cant reach the top levels but it still doesnt mean it cant be helpful. Now show me a list of every general and Admiral and possibly Colonels and equivalents and lets see how where they came from. That would be a better indicator instead of showing who are on the top.After that when you get into the world of politics, I have to imagine that coming from a SA and possibly being part of an old boys networks is going to give you a leg up
I'd just refer you to my post above.
You make a good point, and I am not trying to say one should choose SA over ROTC , but I have to believe that going to SA can be very beneficial in the long run. Not going as you have proven, doesnt mean you cant reach the top levels but it still doesnt mean it cant be helpful. Now show me a list of every general and Admiral and possibly Colonels and equivalents and lets see how where they came from. That would be a better indicator instead of showing who are on the top.
Haha, I went there! Seriously, the tuition was definitely does NOT reflect its state school identity!Don't let Ann Arbor know they are a state school - might burst their arrogance bubble !!!![]()
That makes a lot of senseYou make a good point, and I am not trying to say one should choose SA over ROTC , but I have to believe that going to SA can be very beneficial in the long run. Not going as you have proven, doesnt mean you cant reach the top levels but it still doesnt mean it cant be helpful. Now show me a list of every general and Admiral and possibly Colonels and equivalents and lets see how where they came from. That would be a better indicator instead of showing who are on the top.
As I mentioned above:
"This was true years ago when only WP grads were commissioned into the Regular Army, ROCT grads received a Reserve commission and had to apply for Regular status about the time they would make Captain, if not accepted they went Reserves or go out. Those days ended in the 90s when congress changed the rules to make all grads that graduated either WP or ROTC Regular Officers. As the years went by and for a while now, ROTC has been commissioning nearly 3 times the number of Active Duty officers then WP, you are starting to see a lot more senior officers that are ROTC grads."
A lot of the current senior leadership in the Army commissioned 25 to 30 years ago when the numbers between WP and ROTC were a lot different as well as being only WP grads that were commissioned Regular Army, that network was a lot stronger back then.. My point was more for those that have commissioned in the past 10 years or are looking to commission now or in the near future. With ROTC commissioning a far greater number of officers into the the Active Regular Army, the balance between how and where future senior leadership commissions will shift quite a bit.