1. It's the only sample that there is.
2. There is a reason that the AFROTC Admissions person posts the SAT/ACT, GPA data here. It's useful. It's not the entirety, sure, but ignoring it strikes me as utterly stupid considering that the information is being offered. Clearly, the AF thinks it important. AFROTC has no essays, and the AFROTC Admissions person has expressly downplayed the importance of the fitness test at the scholarship application juncture. Now the interview IS important.
3. The application deadline was in mid-January, and boards are meeting through March. At some point the pool is a fixed universe.
4. This comment, respectfully, is incoherent. If the bar isn't lowered, and files aren't reviewed or rescored again - which is what you wrote earlier - then reboarding would be entirely futile. In other words, if a file is scored as, say, an "85." And the cutoff for that board was a "90." And that "90" is never decreasing - which is what you are writing here - then the "85" person will never be awarded a scholarship. Do you see the problem?
5. This is really condescending. Respectfully, I don't need to be lectured about plans. They are well taken care of either way.