AROTC National Scholarship Board Insight (2020)

Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
680
There is lots of not-good information floating around on this forum. I want to set everyone straight with information I confirmed today (31JAN2020) with Cadet Command RMID (Incentive Division). Then provide some insight.

1. Each student's file is only looked by one board. If your file was ready for the 1st board, it isn't seen again by the 2nd and 3rd board. You get one look by a group of PMS' who will vote your file. That is worth 25% of your total score.

2. If you improve your GPA or ACT/SAT or PFA after you have been boarded you can submit the updates (and should), but a human (PMS) on a board will not revote your file. Your file has already been voted. You will simply receive more points in that specific category and your placement on the Order of Merit List (OML) will change.

3. Students need to bring the strongest file possible to a board. Even if that means missing a board to wait on updated/improved GPA/ACT/etc.

**************************************************
My analysis of why going to the board with a strong file is important. The PMS' general vote on the Student Athlete Leader (SAL) concept. And you are only voted on once. (Disclaimer--I can not predict the future based on past performance, I did not sit on any of this year's boards, and this is my opinion only)

--If you have a low ACT you receive fewer points in the ACT part of your file. You then lose more points at the board for the Student section. (double loss of points)

--If you have a low PFA you receive fewer points in the PFA part of your file. You then lose more points at the board for the Athlete section. You may also have lost points during the interview because the PMS doubts you can pass the Army Physical Fitness Test and writes that. (triple loss of points) (Physical fitness is incredibly important and a critical factor in determining success or not in ROTC. You may not agree, but trust me. A 8:00 mile gives a male 20/50 points on the run and is a pace on which you fail the APFT. A PMS is not going to vote favorably when the recipient needs to pass the APFT to contract).

--If you go to the first board with a low ACT score then update your score after you retake it in February you may raise your ACT points, but the board has already docked points you can never regain. Your file was voted on with the low ACT scores. Your bump on the OML is less than if you had gone to the 2nd or 3rd board with the higher ACT in your file.

--The CBEF is important and no one but the algorithm sees your score. This probably accounts for some of the variances in who received offers.

--Comparing your ACT/PFA/GPA with others who won will only drive your bonkers. What you are missing is what the PMS wrote in the interview, their leadership positions, and the internal workings of a board which causes members to vote a specific way. A PMS who was an Eagle Scout/Boy's State might vote higher a student with those but lower GPA/ACT than someone who isn't an Eagle Scout/Boy's State but higher GPA/ACT. This probably accounts for some variances in who received offers.

-- A PMS can give you a great interview then check the "Do not recommend for a scholarship" block because they saw something that raises a red flag.

--There are several 1000 applicants for these scholarships. The boards get it right. No one sees what the boards see except the boards. Trust the process.

--If you want to do Army ROTC do Army ROTC. Find a university that you will do well at and go. That is the most important thing.

Finally- There are 30 Soldiers waiting for your to arrive and assume command of their platoon. Study hard and be physical fit, mentally strong and morally straight because winning matters.
 
There is lots of not-good information floating around on this forum. I want to set everyone straight with information I confirmed today (31JAN2020) with Cadet Command RMID (Incentive Division). Then provide some insight.

1. Each student's file is only looked by one board. If your file was ready for the 1st board, it isn't seen again by the 2nd and 3rd board. You get one look by a group of PMS' who will vote your file. That is worth 25% of your total score.

2. If you improve your GPA or ACT/SAT or PFA after you have been boarded you can submit the updates (and should), but a human (PMS) on a board will not revote your file. Your file has already been voted. You will simply receive more points in that specific category and your placement on the Order of Merit List (OML) will change.

3. Students need to bring the strongest file possible to a board. Even if that means missing a board to wait on updated/improved GPA/ACT/etc.

**************************************************
My analysis of why going to the board with a strong file is important. The PMS' general vote on the Student Athlete Leader (SAL) concept. And you are only voted on once. (Disclaimer--I can not predict the future based on past performance, I did not sit on any of this year's boards, and this is my opinion only)

--If you have a low ACT you receive fewer points in the ACT part of your file. You then lose more points at the board for the Student section. (double loss of points)

--If you have a low PFA you receive fewer points in the PFA part of your file. You then lose more points at the board for the Athlete section. You may also have lost points during the interview because the PMS doubts you can pass the Army Physical Fitness Test and writes that. (triple loss of points) (Physical fitness is incredibly important and a critical factor in determining success or not in ROTC. You may not agree, but trust me. A 8:00 mile gives a male 20/50 points on the run and is a pace on which you fail the APFT. A PMS is not going to vote favorably when the recipient needs to pass the APFT to contract).

--If you go to the first board with a low ACT score then update your score after you retake it in February you may raise your ACT points, but the board has already docked points you can never regain. Your file was voted on with the low ACT scores. Your bump on the OML is less than if you had gone to the 2nd or 3rd board with the higher ACT in your file.

--The CBEF is important and no one but the algorithm sees your score. This probably accounts for some of the variances in who received offers.

--Comparing your ACT/PFA/GPA with others who won will only drive your bonkers. What you are missing is what the PMS wrote in the interview, their leadership positions, and the internal workings of a board which causes members to vote a specific way. A PMS who was an Eagle Scout/Boy's State might vote higher a student with those but lower GPA/ACT than someone who isn't an Eagle Scout/Boy's State but higher GPA/ACT. This probably accounts for some variances in who received offers.

-- A PMS can give you a great interview then check the "Do not recommend for a scholarship" block because they saw something that raises a red flag.

--There are several 1000 applicants for these scholarships. The boards get it right. No one sees what the boards see except the boards. Trust the process.

--If you want to do Army ROTC do Army ROTC. Find a university that you will do well at and go. That is the most important thing.

Finally- There are 30 Soldiers waiting for your to arrive and assume command of their platoon. Study hard and be physical fit, mentally strong and morally straight because winning matters.
Thank you for your service to our country.
 
That insight is HUGE and a complete game changer. Hindsight is 20/20, had I known this, I would not have applied to the first board as my ACT scores went up dramatically from the first board to second board. All the chatter about getting your package in for the first board to give yourself the best opportunity is completely BAD GOUGE, unless your package is nails from the get go. Great information and much appreciated. #gocats
 
I wonder what is considered “low” in the eyes of the boards? Is it not meeting the threshold of 1100/24?
 
I wonder what is considered “low” in the eyes of the boards? Is it not meeting the threshold of 1100/24?
Meeting the standard is usually considered low. I saw that 32 was the average from either the first or second board. Below that is “low”
 
1373 (SAT) was the average for the 4-Year winners in 2019.
 
That insight is HUGE and a complete game changer. Hindsight is 20/20, had I known this, I would not have applied to the first board as my ACT scores went up dramatically from the first board to second board. All the chatter about getting your package in for the first board to give yourself the best opportunity is completely BAD GOUGE, unless your package is nails from the get go. Great information and much appreciated. #gocats
This is my exact thought. Had I known the strategy was to hold off until your file was the best it was to get, I wouldn’t have pushed forward so fast with getting it in for the first board. “Back then”, I was under the impression the sooner you got your file in the best. You would better your chances with having three boards verses two or one shot. I now know the strategy and it’s sad unless you have had outside consultation, it keeps those “uninformed” potential contenders behind the eight ball the entire three rounds. Bottom line, I found this forum one board to late - story of my life!! The knowledge I’ve gained on this forum has been fantastic. I just wished I did my research sooner.
 
TBH, I was a little surprised when I saw that SAT number. It's pretty darn high for an average, as the companion West Point slide (SAT 1295) showed. I would venture a guess that their yield from 4Y awards with the SAT that high isn't all it could be. But that's only a guess. What that means, if my guess is right, is that a lot of unused scholarships get turned back into the brigade/battalion pools rather than activated up front.
 
@Montana State Army ROTC wow! This is such great practical information. This completely echoes what my DD was toLtd prior to the first board in 2015 when visiting a ROO at one of her schools. To get her file stronger, especially ACT and submit for the second board, that she was not a first round candidate. It got her butt in gear and she really applied herself to study for the ACT (4th sitting) and raised it by 4 points, to the exact target the ROO had given her. Every ROO she visited gave her great information that ultimately led to her submitting the best application she could. I highly recommend to those wanting to apply next year to start visiting now, it isn’t too early.

Oh and while those not in the room of the board, including any ROO cannot tell you what will happen, obviously, they can give you a realistic viewpoint and be clear where you can and should improve. I always say “clear is kind” and she was clearly told it wasn’t good enough, she was also told that she was a strong candidate but probably not a four year candidate, but a 3 year AD. They were correct, she submitted second Board with her improved ACT (interview points were higher too because of the PMS was impressed on how she persevered retaking the ACT and was able to make such a big improvement), and received a 3 year AD last board.

The best part was after those meetings she took having a plan B ready to go because she knew this was the path she wanted with or without a scholarship.

Thanks again @Montana State Army ROTC you are a great resource for this forum!
 
I am going to have to give my DS a huge apology. He did not get everything ready for the first board and I thought that would hurt him. It actually helped him immensely. His Act went from a 30 to 32 in December, 1 semester grades were great and those went in, he also ran a major marathon and placed 3 in age group with an incredible time. I am certain having these things made a huge difference and had he done the first board none of those things would have been in his file. IT also gave him time to recover A little from that marathon and he maxed out the fitness test. This thread needs to be highlighted so that people coming up next year can appreciate that concept of building the best file you can before filing. Even if that means waiting for 2 or 3 board. Especially if that can give you time to get the test score up. I am only saying that because that is one thing you can do more prep for and improve. The gpa is what t is so to speak, but if you need a semester to add to bring it up that’s good to know too. THis also gives more time to prep for fitness.

Ds was awarded a 4 year scholarship to three schools, two of which were his top two listed. We did not expect that at all and he got things in right at the deadline for the second board. He was down to the wire because of the interview. Could not get the local person to get back with him. He had to skype his interview with a PMS 7 hours away .
 
I dont think I have ever heard anyone recommend submittting early, at the expense of your best package. In fact, I’ve only read the opposite: it’s better to wait and present your BEST self.

Also, shouldn’t your recruiter be advising the same way? Hoping all who are waiting have good news soon!
 
shouldn’t your recruiter be advising the same way?
Recruiters may think about it differently. DD's ROTC recruiter stressed the importance of making first board because not as many applicants have submitted, and that competition for remaining spots increases down the road.
 
PMS where my DS has his interview encouraged applying to 1st board as well but also instructed him to follow up with accomplishments that might impact his application. Sure enough he had a 2 point composite increase on his ACT as well as some All Conference and District athletic honors and submitted all before 2nd board. PMS confirmed all of this info was added ahead of the 2nd review board and I’m sure it helped in the award of a 4 year AROTC scholarship (received top 3 schools as well).
 
To be clear, if the ACT can be retaken etc prior to the first board, obviously that is great, but I think the advice is if the things that need to be improved can’t be done before the first board do not rush it.

I don’t know current numbers but for 2015-2016 there were 2500 ish scholarships awarded during all 3 boards, and only 300-400 first board, just to give perspective.
 
I dont think I have ever heard anyone recommend submittting early, at the expense of your best package. In fact, I’ve only read the opposite: it’s better to wait and present your BEST self.

Also, shouldn’t your recruiter be advising the same way? Hoping all who are waiting have good news soon!
Actually it is on here all the time, either applicants trying to hurry for first board, or advice being to get it in. And for Army there doesn’t have to be any recruiter involved at all. While contacting a ROO is a great strategy during the process, a lot of kids first interaction is during the PMS Interview, they might also meet with the ROO at that point.
 
Actually it is on here all the time, either applicants trying to hurry for first board, or advice being to get it in. And for Army there doesn’t have to be any recruiter involved at all. While contacting a ROO is a great strategy during the process, a lot of kids first interaction is during the PMS Interview, they might also meet with the ROO at that point.

My apologies...got lost which program I was reading. I’ve no experience at all with ARMY I’ve got AFROTC, USAFA, USNA, and NROTC exposure x 3 sons. No army.

Good info. Although I personally stilll wouldn’t rush for a board I was not presenting my best package to. Find it hard to believe that’s the advice people give. But sounds like they must?
 
Back
Top