for what it's worth, my understanding from BGO training, and review of all the docs available to us, is that only the most recent scores count. that is consistent with PatternIsFull, but not consistent with Norfolk. The doc re: CFA states only "Recommendations: refer to maximums, and, take multiple times"
according to PatternIsFull, admissions is confirming as of yesterday, that only the most recent score counts? would be nice for them to post a definitive answer in Blackboard or BGOIS
regarding the question from above:
Procedurally ...
1. Can a candidate who already did the CFA, retake it with a coach and if they like the new results, contact the SA they want to redo the CFA? When portal is cleaned, Coach can resubmit new results. Is there anything prohibiting this?
2. If the above is specifically disallowed by SA, when the CFA is cleared on portal, and candidate retakes the test ... can’t they tell the coach to throw away the results and retake it until they are satisfied?
I suspect most people improve so it is not really an issue.
to the best of my knowledge:
for 1. if candidate wants to retake, then candidate contacts admissions and requests it. Admissions clears the scores and sends a new link to the coach. After the test, the coach enters the new scores. You are not supposed to do the CFA ahead of time, and only request the retake from admissions if you like the scores. there is nothing to prevent this, but i think the instructions to the person doing the scoring makes it clear.
for 2. the answer is that as soon as you request the retake, the old scores are cleared, awaiting the new scores. technically, the coach needs to submit the new scores, whatever they are. if candidate doesn't like them, the candidate can retake as many times as he/she would like.
there is nothing to prevent the coach from gaming the system. likewise, there is nothing to prevent the coach from bending the rules - ie. giving more rest time between events, or letting the candidate re-do the run later, or try the bball through again. like most things, it's based on the honor system.
i think that there have been enough abuses of this at USMA that they now require video evidence of CFA in a lot of cases, and i wouldn't be surprised if USNA were to move in that direction at some point.