rjb
10-Year Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2014
- Messages
- 522
The obvious problem is that the USCG is not part of DOD but rather under DHS, not sure of legal ramifications here but merging law enforcement issues with national security issues could be a problem
national defense is a national security issue, semantics. One of the primary missions of the Coast Guard is law enforcement so a question I would raise is does a DOD overlap potentially conflict with Posse Commitatus? By and large I would support having the Commandant on the JCS, the Coast Guard does not get enough respect or visibility.14USC1 establishes it as a military branch. 14USC89 establishes it as a federal law enforcement agency.
DOD doesn't do national security, it does national defense (facing in v. facing out). And other than the Air Force and the Space Force, all of the services (including the Coast Guard) are older than the DOD.
There are no issues. In fact, it would do DOD some good to have a more present force. Why this wasn't done long ago, I don't know, but I'd guess it's because DOD doesn't play well with others.
national defense is a national security issue, semantics. One of the primary missions of the Coast Guard is law enforcement so a question I would raise is does a DOD overlap potentially conflict with Posse Commitatus? By and large I would support having the Commandant on the JCS, the Coast Guard does not get enough respect or visibility.
I get that part but it wasnt my point. Stepping away from the deceased equine now.Again, read 14USC1 and 14USC89. It's already military and LE, per U.S. law.
Now 14USC522, I do believe. But yeah, I agree. Even aside from this, though, the JCS wouldn't be a conflict with CG LE mission at all. The JCS is essentially an advisory board - there is no command power derived from being a member of the board, the authority is derived from being, in this case, the Commandant of the Coast Guard. Each JC still answers operationally to their respective Secretary, in this case the Secretary of Homeland Security. I think it's a great idea, and it's always surprised me that it wasn't already a thing.14USC89
Now 14USC522, I do believe. But yeah, I agree. Even aside from this, though, the JCS wouldn't be a conflict with CG LE mission at all. The JCS is essentially an advisory board - there is no command power derived from being a member of the board, the authority is derived from being, in this case, the Commandant of the Coast Guard. Each JC still answers operationally to their respective Secretary, in this case the Secretary of Homeland Security. I think it's a great idea, and it's always surprised me that it wasn't already a thing.
Yes, a few years ago as I understand it.Wait, did it change?
Said no one clinging to the upside-down hull of a boat.is the coast guard even military?
Said no one clinging to the upside-down hull of a boat.
I remember once my DS was checking a bag on an outbound from Orlando back to where ever, and the attendant told him the CG wasn't Military and he had to pay to check his bags. For some reason, that kid could care less what anyone thinks and he just paid the $25.
I'll behave - or maybe I'll have to circle back on that
Ladies and gentlemen, I present a comprehensive history of jokes made about the Coast Guard since 1790! We all applaud your originalityis the coast guard even military?
i kid
I Kid
I KID
but do USCG recruits still have to be over 6' tall? You know so they can wade ashore if the boat sinks![]()